WebsterMark wrote on 10/31/19 at 09:05:05:Not at all. Been roaming on top the rocks-
Let’s test that. Back on the 23rd, you slithered out to argue the President's apparent crimes were no concern, citing a lack of direct witness:
"Yet in the publicly released portion of his testimony, Mr. Taylor neither described any direct conversation with Mr. Trump himself nor made any reference to documents or recordings that would explicitly implicate the president. Instead, he provided a road map for investigators by quoting others around Mr. Trump describing his actions and statements."
So is this is yet another Chicken Little The Sky is Falling crock of BS that feeds a media bias another big $h!t sandwich but otherwise is nothing but opinion and one man being pi$$ed off at the audacity that an Elected President would pursue his own agenda? Given that's been what every other crock of $hit you clowns have gotten all worked up about, I'd say that's the odds.Of course we had the President’s direct admission- and now we have multiple first-hand accounts of both that infamous conversation and the scheme surrounding it. At the date of that earlier post, it was obvious from Trump Administration actions that
they believed they had committed crimes, taking extra-ordinary steps to cover up their misdeeds.
You don’t stand on rock, Mark- you throw them and run, lacking the courage of conviction to weather the testing of your claims. Honest, reasonable people knew your argument for dismissing the whistleblower's reporting was hollow. Where are you now that your arbitrary excuse has been removed? You pretend we don't all know what we all know, post yet another demagogic scree in defiance of honest regard. Mr. Cut-n-Paste, llacking limbs, relies on others to write lies for you.
You can't stand in the withering light of truth, slithering back into the muck.
Pages: 1 
