"Then using your observation, the economy, Trump is sure to win if it continues unabated.....yes?"

 No.

 I am saying that the entirety of the US political an economic system is too vast to be controlled without substantial input from large corporations or other nations by the current number of US citizens that vote.  The Presidency is a very small part of the overall Political system.  


"You want to define your within reason?  I get the law part, which, I think lots of people think the separation clause prohibits its expression."

 If I create a religion that prohibits clothing I am free to practice it, but not in public and not at work.  

 Are you somehow under the impression that anyone has said religion can not be practiced, within reason, in Government or in public?  I'm not sure why we are having this conversation.

"So if a person has no religion/ethics, and they believe they can Kill a Human, until it is completely out of the body of a person that carried it. They can, 'Apply it' ?
If a person has a religion that says to throw homosexuals off a roof. They can apply it ?"

 No.  Why would you even think that?

 Nothing, as in nobody or zero percent of this discussion has indicated that one can violate law in any way for any reason.  No one can violate law.

 As a matter of fact I very specifically said "within the law" regarding one's individual application of personal belief.  Just because a human does not believe killing is wrong does not mean they can violate law.

 One can not violate law.

 Violation of law is not allowed.

 Practice of religion can not circumvent law.  The absence of religion can not circumvent law.