This is criminal negligence in ultra-liberal States like... Florida and Texas.   Look it up, Buttercup.  The parent's carelessness constitutes child endangerment, too- something we've been forced to confront via statute as well.   Serowbot has advocated for law enforcement- and, more importantly, the child's welfare; in denouncing him, you put your personal contest before reasonable care.

A pen is more powerful than a sword.
Therefore no more nonsense arguments about gun, s.
Everyone recognizes the untruth.

Rather learn to face the truth and put it on paper.

zevenenergie wrote on 10/23/19 at 11:41:44:

Therefore no more nonsense arguments about gun, s.

In this Nation, a little thing call the 1st Amendment exists.
It is what allows the tt to say:

T And T Garage wrote on Today at 7:34am:
Just one more reason to hate the orange cokcsucker sitting in the oval office.

Without reprisal, or fear of being sent to Siberia.

MnSpring wrote on 10/23/19 at 14:16:51:



All moronic, batsh!t crazy comparisons.

But then, I guess i shouldn't expect anything different from you.

"A Mother has a child that can defeat the gate on her swimming pool,
Clearly, “Her obsession with 'Pools' makes her an unfit mother.
She should either have to give up her ‘pool’, or give up her children”

 A mother who can not take reasonable measures to keep children from drowning in a pool should not have a pool, or not have children.



A Mother has a child that puts a bobby pin/Fork in a electoral outlet,
Clearly, “Her obsession with ‘outlets‘ makes her an unfit mother.
She should either have to give up her ‘outlets’, or give up her children”

 A mother who does not take reasonable measures to keep a child from electrocuting itself should not have electrical outlets, or a child.



A Mother has a child that can manipulate the lock on the under cabinet door, and get to the Drano etc. Clearly, “Her obsession with ‘cabinets’ makes her an unfit mother.
She should either have to give up her ‘cabinets’, or give up her children”

 A mother who can not take reasonable measures to keep her child from drinking chemicals should not have chemicals or not have children.  Cabinets are not the issue, chemicals are.  Try to at least make a comparison people won't laugh at or dismiss entirely.



A Mother texts while driving with her child, Clearly,
“Her obsession with ‘phones’ makes her an unfit mother.
She should either have to give up her ‘phone’, or give up her children”

 A mother who can not take reasonable measures to eliminate texting and driving while her children are in the car or she has the potential to impact any other person, or property should not have a cellphone or children in her vehicle.

 Are we saying that parents who will not take reasonable measures to protect their children should not have consequences?

 No.

 The question is did this mother take reasonable measures to keep that firearm out of her child's hands?  We do not know the answer to that at this time.  

So we argue semantics over a topic we can't have enough information about to make educated assessments over.  It's mostly speculation.

Eegore wrote on 10/23/19 at 16:43:48:

 You did.
http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1569110766/8#8

Try Again !

AFTER, you read, and understand, the first line, in the First post, Not #8.

T And T Garage wrote on 10/24/19 at 05:44:00:

You said "This IS the way it will happen"
You may not have written it,
but you certainly endorsed it.

Examine the utter stupidly of YOUR statement !

You said: I said, those words, then you said: You may not have written it.

Let's see your SPIN, on how I can 'not write something', yet 'say' it ?  
If this was a live, in person discussion, that could be true, one could say something, and not write it. It is not possible in a purely written form.
(Especially if one was to actually READ the first line, which you apparently did not)

Now let's examine this: you certainly endorsed it.
Yes, the entire opinion about Red laws.
If you were not so LAZY, (as you frequently tell others they are), you could look that opinion up, and actually read it, and then find out their are at least a dozen slightly different varieties. Where someone else, the re-poster of that opinion, changed/added/subtracted, a couple of words here and their.

Again, poorly written, (and written with the intent of Banning), 'red laws', are vary dangerous.  
Just think I, here in Minn, could start a campaign of Lies and Deceit, fabricate information and events, and say tt has a gun and is very dangerous.
Then your buddy Beto can come to YOUR house and confiscate your, 'gun'. (the one you say you have). And if you don't produce it, be prepared to have you place torn apart to find it.
Woe be it, if someone said YOU had a, 'arsenal'. The gun grabbers/Confiscators, would totaly rip you place apart looking for all 10 guns, and the 100 rounds of ammunition.

T And T Garage wrote on 10/24/19 at 08:54:14:

Now, just answer the questions.

Would that be the same way,
YOU,
and clones,
answer questions ?