I just don't see it Web......
I was shocked when Hillary gave her attention, which equals name recognition, but then again, that lady is off her rocker....
I think those votes she would peel off, like
mine Are not deeply committed voters to any one candidate, and tend to blow around like a leaf in the wind, voting for (if they even bother) whoever blew them last
However, and I think you prolly see this to, and I can't ever recall the heavily invested entities being so overt in their concerns over certain candidates getting elected, with Facebook, Amazon, etc....being good examples re: Warren.
At my level, I do not see her as the same threat they do.....
Which gets me to think, with all this socialism/progressive leanings being pushed by academia/media, etc, the very game plan of Saul Alinsky....
It has finally ran reached the point that
business has to become more overt, without worrying over the stronghold the media, etc, has on them with the control over the
narrative, calling for boycotts, bad press, etc....
The
INTERNET has provided a new tool to reach the masses and counter punch these charges.... sorta like Trump himself
Anyway...sorta went off on a tangent, that is why I don't see her as a viable candidate....
Now put her with Howard Schultz on the ticket, and I do, and I see Howard winning favorable from businesses, a woman VP, will pull some women, etc...
I think this could make it really interesting, a Ross Perot type of ticket, as Clinton wasn't able to get his numbers up until Ross entered and help bring Bush down.....?????
What, he won with 42% of the vote, Clinton did?