I believe that dovetails with the fact that the DFL already knows they have lost.

They can see that their lies and, ’sky is falling’ , predictions, are now falling on, deaf ears, simply because they have cried, ‘wolf’ to many times.

Which brings us to 2024.
Will the DFL present actual candidates that are worth something?
Will the DFL tone down it’s, ‘give you, give you, give you’, rhetoric ?
Will the DFL actually actually have a viable, ‘plan’ to move forward ?

The problem now with Gabbard is, she is very Anti-Gun. (Who told her that will stop crime), and raise Min Wage.
She is also succumbing to the ‘give you, give you, give you’, rhetoric.
Now, if she runs as a Independent, She will she learn that Banning Guns, and Giving everything away for FREE, will not work.

Is she smart enough to learn, to change her platform for a 2024 run ?

I just don't see it Web......

I was shocked when Hillary gave her attention, which equals name recognition, but then again, that lady is off her rocker....

I think those votes she would peel off, like mine  

Are not deeply committed voters to any one candidate, and tend to blow around like a leaf in the wind, voting for (if they even bother) whoever blew them last  

However, and I think you prolly see this to, and I can't ever recall the heavily invested entities being so overt in their concerns over certain candidates getting elected, with Facebook, Amazon, etc....being good examples re: Warren.

At my level, I do not see her as the same threat they do.....

Which gets me to think, with all this socialism/progressive leanings being pushed by academia/media, etc, the very game plan of Saul Alinsky....

It has finally ran reached the point that business has to become more overt, without worrying over the stronghold the media, etc, has on them with the control over the narrative, calling for boycotts, bad press, etc....  

The INTERNET has provided a new tool to reach the masses and counter punch these charges.... sorta like Trump himself  

Anyway...sorta went off on a tangent, that is why I don't see her as a viable candidate....
Now put her with  Howard Schultz on the ticket, and I do, and I see Howard winning favorable from businesses, a woman VP, will pull some women, etc...

I think this could make it really interesting, a Ross Perot type of ticket, as Clinton wasn't able to get his numbers up until Ross entered and help bring Bush down.....?????

What, he won with 42% of the vote, Clinton did?

raydawg wrote on 10/20/19 at 09:14:06:

The funny thing is,.. Hillary never mentioned Tulsi by name.

“I’m not making any predictions but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who’s currently in the Democratic primary, and they’re grooming her to be the third-party candidate,”
“She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

Why does Gabbard think she's a favourite of the Russians?...

Serowbot wrote on 10/20/19 at 10:54:51:


OMG.....thick.

Tulsi is unwrapping the gift Hilary gave her!

I saw a video she did this morning and while I was watching it, it occurred to me she could end AOC as we know her. Why would anyone pay attention to AOC as long as Tulsi is around? To be clear, I'm not supporting her. Her counterpart on the Republican side is Dan Crenshaw.