"I think perhaps you should go out with younger people and see exactly what's going on and how small things like this are relevant."

 To be fair things like this aren't relevant to many people, and it is much easier to ask a question from the source than to "Google" multiple versions of the same question attempting to match what any one person means.

 I would have no reason to spend time researching a topic or gesture or image that has not impacted me negatively or positively in any way if I can just ask what something means.

 I Googled "Man making brushing gesture on shoulder" and arrived at this:

https://www.google.com/search?q=man+making+brushing+gesture+on+shoulder&rlz=1...

 I'm talking about the time to commit research to an image of a man making a gesture on his shoulder in comparison to the commitment of time it takes to ask "what does that mean?" from the person who presented the material.

 It is typically much faster to ask a direct question of the direct source than it is to research on one's own about a material that has had zero impact prior.   In this case especially because it is not a word that can be easily looked up from a dedicated reference source like a dictionary.

 I'm not saying the knowledge is not beneficial, I am saying it is faster to ask than it is to research.

 Why would I, or Webstermark take the less efficient route?
 

T And T Garage wrote on 10/04/19 at 09:26:18:

it'd be pretty hard not to know what i was inferring.

Yea, you would be correct in that,
Just the same as a 'reporter', inferring, 'Guns Are Bad' !

So the "whistleblower" did not tell the Inspector General they had already spoken (coordinated?) their story with the Democrats on the committee. And the Democrats are protesting the proposal to release the full transcript of Volker's testimony which internal sources have said military aid was never mentioned as a carrot for investigating Biden.

As I said, much like the Blasey-Ford debacle, another fabricated story was grabbed by the Democratics who then piled lie upon lie to try and turn it into something.

This is TDS in action. Politicians survive (particularly true of national Democrats who have a willing national media behind them) by knowing how to manipulate the public but in the case of Trump, TDS has blinded them to reality and they're continually jumping the shark.

Well look, the title is correct.......

We are now on our what.....how many, this is it, stories...????

I wonder why they just don't try and win voters votes, the old fashion way, tell me what you are going to do to make our lives better....  

Well, what will the next BIG BOMBSHELL be ....????

That Trump has small hands?

I know one member here, likes that story  

I am not sure I follow you....do you mean in dirt, like the kind Schiff got played with, or the one he mentioned, in his lying, not parody, in his opening remarks as committee leader?

No, as many have said here, Trump is not a angel, nor above law, or above critique....

However, if YOU, had been true to your OWN testimony, and disclosure, you'd not be saddled with this angst, presently, as you would have moved, out of the country.....  
So, in effect, its on you, you might try owning that, instead of wasting energy on stuff where you have no control......

Just a suggestion mind you, I have absolutely no expectation, tied to this advice  

Whatever......