WebsterMark wrote on 10/01/19 at 04:41:29:You don't know a f'ing thing about the truth in Ukraine and neither do I.
I was just pointing out that the prosecutor that trump is complaining about Biden being involved with ousting, was recognised by er... just about everyone in Europe not just Biden as being corrupt. The exact opposite of what Trump is trying to say.
It's not just bullshit because it was in the NYT's it was everywhere in 2016 like the following
Ukraine’s parliament voted overwhelmingly to fire Viktor Shokin, ridding the beleaguered prosecutor’s office of a figure who is accused of blocking major cases against allies and influential figures and stymying moves to root out graft.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-pr...So the prosecutor that Biden wanted out was ousted by the Ukraine parliament because he was allowing corruption. Insane how Trump does this all the time.
Looks like you're the dope who doesn't have a fcuken clue.
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-shokin-resignation-approved/27641545.htmlThe United States has repeatedly called for top-to-bottom reform of the Prosecutor-General's Office, which antigraft campaigners have said plays a key role in protecting vested interests and allowing corrupt practices to flourish.
@WM, If Biden's son was corruptly dealing with Ukraine, and Biden wanted to protect him, then he'd not want the corrupt prosecutor sacked he'd fight to have him not sacked. If he'd done that, then there might be some smoke.