I ask because I had a quick squizz at Donalds twit feed this morning to see his reaction and while it was exactly what you'd expect, this time is contrasted with the IG's testimony quite sharply.

For example Schiff spent a bit of time focussing on the 'credibility' issue and while the IG did not want to say the words as it was obvious that he's struggling to be an honest public servant yet still go along with the President. Maguire said the whistleblower was credible.

There's already a taped meeting been released that has Trump calling for the whistleblower to be punished which is exactly why the whistleblowers act is there.

The most interesting part of the testimony was when Schiff got Maguire to admit that what he considered a credible report was referred to the White House as to whether it would be released to congress even though the report was about the president and even though Maguire broke the law by not sending it to congress and even though he had the power and the obligation to send it to congress.

eau de sauvage wrote on 09/27/19 at 07:34:05:



Yep, those are the actions of an innocent man....LOL

WebsterMark wrote on 09/27/19 at 09:15:26:



LMAO

Confessed to what?

Cover up....huh, he released the transcript when he didn't legally have to.

Cover up exactly what?

Do you not think a person is entitled to defend themselves against charges?

But Ray, forget about all this, what I'd be interested to know is in spite of your blind loyalty to Trump or whatever it is that makes you excuse anything, are you not even bothered a little bit that Trump is using military aid already approved by congress to pressure a foreign leader to interfere in US elections.

Forget all your TDS symptoms that blinds you to reality, but hasn't it been reported Ukraine had no idea aid was an issue until a month later? There was no mention of aid being dependent upon action during the call right? Didn't the Ukrainian President himself say he felt no pressure whatsoever?
The "whistle blower" said he neither witnessed or was a participate in most, if not all, the events in his "story". (all quotes intentional...)

Did it bother you at all the role Obama, Hilary and the DNC played with regards to the whole faked Russian debacle? I'll answer that for you, no it didn't. Why? Because this is political, this is partisanship. You and the others on here are just pretending you're outraged at Trump damaging the USA.

The left leaning media has been training you to go after Trump by any means necessary much like East Germany used to do with their Olympic athletes. Little by little they been filling you up with a this pretend outrage and releasing you every time they thing they have a chance to undo the last election. You're like 9/11 conspiracy theorist who never listen to logic or proof and you're always ready to pounce on whatever the most recent shred of nonsense you get fed.

The scariest thing you clowns could get called for jury duty and someone's fate lies in your ignorance hands....

WEB....the second hand witness was the stumbling block to releasing the document, as prior to doctoring, or changing this requirement to allow any heresy, it did not meet the threshold to releasing.....

Now, are the charges concerning, yes.......

But if procedures were altered, change, without the proper authority, we have another extremely serious issue to deal with now, as well....

To whom it may concern,

I've just spent about 20 minutes trying to work out how to answer these weirdly fcuked up posts by WM and Ray.

I can only sit here with a fixed knowing smile on my boat, and admire the pristine fcukwittery.

You two simply quote Trump's twitter feed as an answer to anything.