SuzukiSavage.com - sanctuary cities

MnSpring Serious Thumper Offline Younger than most people my age. Posts: 9395 Minn Gender:	sanctuary cities 09/23/19 at 15:42:35 Got it ! Seeing as how, 'sanctuary cities', are so popular. Seeing as how, 'sanctuary cities', do NOT violate Federal Law. Seeing as how, 'sanctuary cities', will, 'fix' everything. When the UL, FDS, Socialists come to Confiscate any Firearm I have. I will simply declare my House a, 'sanctuary house'. And all will be OK !!!!!
Back to top	Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither". Which is *More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly* . IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 28714 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #1 - 09/23/19 at 16:02:38 ...and if you get your local municipality to support you in that, you'll be all set... Good luck with that...
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

MnSpring

Serious Thumper

Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9395
Minn
Gender: male

Re: sanctuary cities
Reply #2 - 09/23/19 at 16:14:21

Serowbot wrote on 09/23/19 at 16:02:38:

...and if you get your local municipality to support you in that, you'll be all set...

What ya talking about !
If a City can say it's a: 'sanctuary city',
and it does, NOT, need any 'support' from the Federal Government.

If a State, can say it's a 'sanctuary State',
and it does, NOT, need any 'support' from the Federal Government.

Why in the world would you think,
my Home, needs ANY, 'permission/support', from the,
Town/Township/County/State/Nation I live in ????

Back to top

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .

IP Logged

Serowbot YaBB Moderator ModSquad Offline OK.... so what's the speed of dark? Posts: 28714 Tucson Az Gender:	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #3 - 09/23/19 at 16:23:58 Ooooookay,... good luck with that, too...
Back to top	Ludicrous Speed !... ... ... IP Logged

justin_o_guy2 Serious Thumper Offline What happened? Posts: 55279 East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #4 - 09/23/19 at 16:27:51 It's even simpler than that. If Bruce Jenner can keep his d!ck and still be a woman, I can keep a gun and still be disarmed.
Back to top	The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke. IP Logged

T And T Garage Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 9839	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #5 - 09/23/19 at 16:44:27 justin_o_guy2 wrote on 09/23/19 at 16:27:51: It's even simpler than that. If Bruce Jenner can keep his d!ck and still be a woman, I can keep a gun and still be disarmed. Nah, you'd still be a d!ck. LMAO - sorry... sorry... I could NOT resist that one!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 8403	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #6 - 09/23/19 at 19:32:16 You mean like marijuana laws are doing right now?
Back to top	IP Logged

MnSpring

Serious Thumper

Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9395
Minn
Gender: male

Re: sanctuary cities
Reply #7 - 09/24/19 at 07:40:45

Eegore wrote on 09/23/19 at 19:32:16:

You mean like marijuana laws are doing right now?

No.
Just like a, 'sanctuary city'.

Ya know, those places where a, 'city/state', totally ignores the Federal Law.
Where that, 'City', gives protection, to a Illegal Alien, (not from Mars), so they cannot be 'Confiscated', (deported).
And the federal government does nothing, (except talk), about it.

That is what my Home, and many others, will become, when/if the Federal Government decides to, (Confiscate) a firearm.
And those who have the room/range, (at their Home), to shoot those Confiscated firearms, will simply thumb their nose at people watching accost the fence.
Just like the, 'sanctuary city/states', do when they have a Murderer, Thief, Vandal, Terrorist, in the 'sanctuary city/state'.

Back to top

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .

IP Logged

Eegore Serious Thumper Offline SuzukiSavage.com Rocks! Posts: 8403	Re: sanctuary cities Reply #8 - 09/24/19 at 07:54:59 No. Just like a, 'sanctuary city'. Ya know, those places where a, 'city/state', totally ignores the Federal Law. All Marijuana is against Federal Law. Marijuana is legal in certain states, even recreationally. Ya know, those places where a, city/state, totally ignores the Federal Law.
Back to top	IP Logged

MnSpring

Serious Thumper

Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9395
Minn
Gender: male

Re: sanctuary cities
Reply #9 - 09/24/19 at 09:30:45

Eegore wrote on 09/24/19 at 07:54:59:

Marijuana is legal in certain states

Interesting discussion could occur.

A 'State/City', makes up it's own rules.
Contrary to the rules of the Nation.

Which are correct ? Which does one follow ?

And going back in time, was there not a,
'War Between the States',
which was started BECAUSE, of, 'States Rights'.

Another point, the people tearing down Statues,
(Many representing the C.W. and people in it)
Are they not the same ones saying they/it represent/s something that the Nation was against ?
And that is the reason they wanted them removed ?

How does that work, when a National law says.
(to the like), 'Deport Illegals'
And a Calf law says: (to the like),
All Illegals come here, we will Protect You.

Which one is correct ?

Back to top

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .

IP Logged

Eegore

Serious Thumper

Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8403

Re: sanctuary cities
Reply #10 - 09/24/19 at 09:56:12

Which one is correct ?

They both are.

Historically states legalize things prior to Federal change. The 19th Amendment for instance.

The Supremacy Clause in Article VI though is the opposite side of that coin. Then look at US v Windsor and we get opposing results.

I think it's more about what the issue is and it's level of enforceability that prevails at the end of the day.

Back to top

IP Logged