"You did not take it any further, as to research who, when, how.
You did not backtrack, those companies/people.
You did no research."

 Incorrect.  I have done research, I have multiple times exclaimed that MN charges for many of the public records, which you have acknowledged, and I have paid for them but yield no, as in none, information pertaining to 5 multiple bankruptcies from a single company.

 You said you have proof of the bankruptcies.  Where is that proof?  Proof isn't saying go look up more information than I have.

 The point is you divert instead of just saying you do not have the proof you claimed you did, you infer I am scamming you asking you for money in return for more.  You claim multiple people use this account, you claim I won't send you money that I am lying, you claim I am also lying about solar research in CO.  

  Workarounds.

Why, a State with 193 days of sunshine,
has 90% LESS, 'Solar Farms',
than a State with 90 days, of sunshine ?

 Multiple variables.  Funding, infrastructure, elected officials, state and local laws to name a few.  

"Those bankruptcies go in the file with the 5 million illegals that voted last election."

 I know.  I just wanted to see if anyone was going to call me out for contradicting my own recommendation.  Or to see if anyone wanted me to provide the paperwork for the MN filings I requested.

MnSpring wrote on 07/31/19 at 17:43:36:

Pretty sure I got that from you... definitely not from any real news source.