The unborn American has no constitutional rights or protections,
Because they are not born or naturalized into the country.
People who have entered illegally are not born or naturalized into the country, yet the same people who are happy to see the unborn killed are demanding the illegal aliens be treated as if
They are citizens...

Do you even know what Roe v. Wade said?
There is no
Constitutional RIGHT to an abortion.
There are no constitutional rights for the unborn, that's all.
But lefties seem to believe that people who are here illegally are due the same considerations as citizens.
That's completely without reason.
Who breaks into your house and gets adopted into your family?

All humans in the US are protected under the Constitution.  Unborn humans are not.

I don't believe that's true. All humans in the US have varying forms of protection under the Constitution, not all have the same. An illegal immigrant can't legally vote for example. (not yet anyway)

An unborn child in which the mother declares the child is wanted and has value has certain rights. A robber who hits a pregnant woman and kills her unborn baby but not the mother, can be charged with murder, not just assault. However, another woman who decides she does not want an unborn baby conceived on the same day as the one murdered by the robber, can legally abort (kill, murder, semantics at this point) that human.

In one case, the human has the right to justice for it's murder but not in the other case. It's all because one mother declare the child has value as a human  but not in the other.

A choice to do what exactly?

a tourist visiting the U.S.
has the same rights as you and I
AND
must abide by our laws
UNLESS
they have diplomatic immunity

"A choice to do what exactly?"

 Have a legal abortion in a clinical environment.  You already know this, did you want to have a semantics conversation about it?

You don't get to decide because it's how you feel. Read the constitution.

 I read case law and how the US Constitution is applied to actual situations, not internet articles.  I'd reference 20 or 30 cases easily but historically nobody here reads them, and you specifically disregard any data you don't "care" about.

 First you are obviously mixing foreign policy with US Judicial law so the application of the US Constitution is not even the same.

 The Constitution does not have written into all of it that the rights are specific to citizens, some portions do, some don't.

 Illegal immigrants get the right to a speedy trial.  They have the right to legal representation (contrary to popular belief this is not paid for by US tax dollars)  They do not get to vote.  Even at that you are talking Administrative law, not Judicial/Criminal or Civil.  Administrative Court has typically been ruled immune to review by judicial standards.

 After Sept 11 2001 this was addressed constantly, look up why SAMs were started, look up why certain foreign nationals were sent to Cuba and not the US.  Very specifically to ease burden of legal interpretation regarding their Constitutional rights.


 Here's some easy ones people might read:

https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/297/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2017/01/30/does-the-constitution-pr...

thumperclone wrote on 07/14/19 at 07:35:45:


So me as an alien to the US can rock up and vote? Wow how generous.

By determining that abortion is private medical matter, the SCOTUS is taking the position that a fetus is not a person and does not get legal protection, up to the point that it becomes viable.

History and religion has generally said a fetus becomes a person at the "quickening".  This is approximately when it can be felt to kick externally and is basically viable if born at that time.

Arguing that the 14th amendment does not protect abortion is like saying it doesn't protect ear piercing.  
It protects women's right's to determine what is done to their bodies.
It is a private matter.

What you want, is to give a fetus full personhood at inception.
SCOTUS says not until the "quickening".
So there's your beef,.. not the 14th amendment.

When is an egg a chicken?...