"There's much more in depth studies of this out there but this one makes my point rather handily. Jordan Peterson is discussing the recent transgender speech law for Canada bill c16 and explaining how it's been written so that people who don't follow it can be criminally charged with hate speech whatever that is."

 You realize just stating Canada Bill C16 is tremendously more useful than:

"16 countries have curtailed the freedom of speech in the name of justice for trannies"

 Nobody wants you to be a research assistant but citing zero useable reference then saying we should look it up doesn't get anyone anywhere.  It makes it impossible for anyone to see your point of view with their own eyes.

Eegore wrote on 06/28/19 at 15:53:24:


Ok two can play this game. Prove me wrong.
Read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Act_to_amend_the_Canadian_Human_Rights_Act_an
d_the_Criminal_Code

Want me to tie your shoes too?

I don't think speech should be regulated by law,... but I do think it should become socially unacceptable.  The "N" word for example is just not socially acceptable anymore.  

As far as "book burning",... what about Trump restricting his own scientists from publishing any Climate Change evidence?... Pages of evidence have been taken down by decree from EPA websites.
This is far more impactful than any social wordplay.

On the whole, I am more comfortable defending peace protests, and human rights protests, equality, fairness, justice, and humanity, than hate, white supremacy, guns, bigotry, and nationalism.
The Right has a much tougher row to hoe here.

"Oh woe is me" sayeth the Right,..."it's so unfair" they say with hypocritical Bibles in hand.
Sorry,.. I don't feel sorry...

ACLU has the unenviable task of defending hate speech, but I don't.
...and they don't get the respect they deserve from the Right that they deserve for their efforts.
I see the principle of defending it,.. I just don't envy the task,.. for the Right or the ACLU.

Science journals don't consider all opinions to be valid or equal.
Only opinions with scientific validity.
You're free to say the world is flat,.. but you ain't gonna' get it published in a scientific journal.
That ain't prejudice,... it's just reality.

 "Let me help, must be different browsers/search engines."

 Thank you.
 
 Can you provide the search terms you used, the results are not complimentary to search engine advice unless the terms searched are provided.  As it is presented now, I can utilize results you provide, but would not know how you arrived at them.

 I supplied a list of search terms I used and no direction towards actual law was provided within the first 20 results of each indicated phrase.

Eegore wrote on 06/28/19 at 20:21:55:

 Can you provide the search terms you used,

Try, ‘banning free speech’

Here is ACLU
“…To be clear, the First Amendment does not protect behavior on campus that crosses the line into targeted harassment or threats, or that creates a pervasively hostile environment for vulnerable students….”
“…public colleges and universities have no obligation to fund student publications; however, the Supreme Court has held that if a public university voluntarily provides these funds, it cannot selectively withhold them from particular student publications simply because they advocate a controversial point of view….”
“…College administrators cannot, however, dictate which speakers students may invite to campus on their own initiative. …”

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/view-considers-limits-free-speech-online-fa...
“…”The View" co-hosts questioned if a Facebook's recent ban of individuals they deemed "dangerous" is a violation of the First Amendment.
…”  “…In addition to this, Facebook said that when someone is banned under this policy, praise and supporting of those individuals is prohibited under their policy….”
“…"I have no issue with it at all," co-host Ana Navarro said. "I want them shutdown. I want them silenced. I want them muted. I think they are horrible for our society. …”

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/02/facebook-bans-far-right-alex-jones-...
“…“It’s unfortunate that online speech doesn’t have enough room for controversial views,” he said in an email….”
“…Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg notoriously said on a podcast last year that he'd allow posts denying the Holocaust as long as the people behind them sincerely believed what they were saying….”
“…In an escalation of its content enforcement actions, the company also booted a small group of fringe right-wing figures, including commentator and provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, Infowars contributor Paul Joseph Watson, activist Laura Loomer and Paul Nehlen…”
“…"Every time Facebook makes the choice to remove content, a single company is exercising an unchecked power to silence individuals and remove them from what has become an indispensable platform for the speech of billions,” American Civil Liberties Union staff attorney Vera Eidelman told POLITICO in March. “When speech is censored by private parties based on the content of that speech, there's nothing stopping Facebook — or YouTube or Twitter — from using that same power to censor organizations fighting to protect abortion rights or individuals fighting against climate change tomorrow.”…”

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/32187-war-on-free-speech-f...
“…Facebook announced that it will institute a ban against certain personalities it considers “dangerous.” The bans will also affect the Instagram platform, which Facebook owns….”
“…“It’s a bizarre political stunt and they’re trying to hide their censorship of conservatives by mixing in Louis Farrakhan,” Jones said….”

Here is one, you can go to, and look up country by country:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country

Was gonna look at L.A. Times, however, can’t see what is written, because they block me, and only allow me to view their page, if I PAY them.  It was the SAME with mercurynews.com.  A soon as I clicked, ’No Thanks’, I was directed to total nonsense, and not at all about the subject.

So now, here you have just a drop in a thimble, of people wanting, and denying, 'Free Speech', because the view expressed does not mesh with their view.
Kinda like this forum, A group of people can call a politician absolutely anything they want,
and one person call a politician one thing, and the feces hits the fan.
All because of, 'political', orientation.
Can it be, Sure it can, this is private, the owner can do anything they want. Just like a very small scale, F.B.

Read these links, all of them,
find and read, the many, many more that are out their,
then come to your own conclusion.

(Unless you want the easy way,
and let AOC, BS, CY just TELL YOU, what to think)

Explain WHY they should BE there.
It's stupid.
Are the boys gonna suddenly start their period?
It's not BIOLOGICALLY possible.
We are bending over backwards as a society to tell those who Need mental health care that they are just fine.
It's insane. And giving them the opportunities to compete against Real Girls and steal their opportunities for scholarships and accolades for their hard work.
If anyone can't see how wrong all of this is, they,too, could stand a few hours on
The Couch.

A student at Brown U wants to make a political point.
The bunch in your panties is proof he made it.

"“I think that if we can implement this project, that will add to this conversation and make it more of an accessible topic,” she said. "


Your cooperation in adding to the conversation and publicity of this stunt is appreciated.
You are officially a tool of the free tampon movement.  

Seriously,.. what difference does this make to you personally?
No one is making you buy them or wear them.
Relax and let the students make their point.