Before the rush to canonize this whole 'trans' thing, I think we should remind ourselves of a few basic facts: if a man puts on a dress and calls himself "Charlotte", he's not a woman, he's a mentally ill man with a woman's name wearing a dress. If he starts receiving female hormone injections, he's still not a woman, he's a mentally ill man with a woman's name wearing a dress, with messed up body chemistry. If he undergoes gender reassigment surgery, he's still not a woman, he's a mentally ill man with a woman's name wearing a dress, with messed up body chemistry and no thingy. If he gets a document from a court or other government agency saying he's a woman, he's still not a woman, he's a mentally ill man with a woman's name wearing a dress, with messed up body chemistry, no thingy, and a legal document that caters to his delusion. And if he and his friends manage to get a law passed that says he must be addressed by the female pronouns he prefers, he's still not a woman, he's a mentally ill man with a woman's name wearing a dress, with messed up body chemistry, no thingy, a legal document that caters to his delusion, and backed with the force of law. To sum all of this up: He's still a man, baby! And do you know what the funny part of all this is? The people who are vigorously pushing this like to think of themselves as the party of science."
Idiots

Yuh values are plagiarized...

Here Jog......

https://americanmind.org/features/why-the-new-right-rises/theorizing-the-moral-f
oundations-of-democracy/

Boys and girls are easily labeled.
No decision by the thingy or girl thingy owners CHANGES it. A D.N.A. test is science.
It will say if it's male or female.
Ohhh, please, someone pretend that the .1% of the .1% who are born genetically messed up are relevant to the argument.
Yes, surgery is science.
But the goal is to ignore the obvious.
Someone is deranged and in need of help.
Science says
Dude,hacking that off and giving you a permanent wound that you can pretend is what women have is not the answer.
The whole idea is antiscience, being promoted by lefties. It's LITERALLY INSANE, and we're teaching our children to call it okay. Really people?
IS there NOTHING you would just say no to? Aside from being a rational and conservative American?

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 06/26/19 at 07:15:29:

Apparently you found a way...

I don't feel it is any more rational than saying that if a guy asks you to refer to him as a woman, you would "kick the ignrant sumbich in the nuts"

 Assaulting the mentally ill somehow makes sense and is acceptable?  It doesn't seem there is a way to have a logical conversation about the topic at this time.

Eegore wrote on 06/26/19 at 15:55:37:


While it is possible that would demonstrate for him he REALLY is a he, and that looks like something I would say,
That is NOT what I JUST said, yet, rather than address what I Did JUST say, you're running and hiding from what I said, in the post above.
You're the one refusing to have a conversation, because I stated my position in a way you can't argue with, so, dig up last , irrelevant statements and pretend you have not been given the opportunity to argue your point.
I don't blame any of you.
I just burned your whole position down.

AND
You ADMITTED they are mentally ill.
Good for you.
Now, admit that bowing to their twisted thinking is hurting SOCIETY and THEM.

"You ADMITTED they are mentally ill."

 Incorrect.  I was using your assessment method.  To clarify you stated: "Someone is deranged and in need of help."

 That is what I was indicating, I was saying Your assessment is that a transgender is mentally ill, and if they ask you to call them a woman, you will assault them.  As if that solves anything beyond helping you feel tough.

 Also I already addressed your original post:

"The problem with articles like this is people ignore psychology and want to stick to the biology exclusively."

 Ignoring psychology and talking exclusively about biology addresses only part of the issue.