"How can you "care" if you do not take the "potential" of its impact on others, into consideration, even if it is the sponsor, ratifier, or author of such policies is not your concern?"

 I read the proposal and research who and how it changes things.

 Why would I need to know the name, affiliation, gender, race, and propensity for racism of the author to know how the proposal is written and works?

"Why, would you give more credence to a POV regarding racism , if it was presented by a minority, or a white person?"

 I wouldn't.  Racism isn't illegal unless put into practice in discriminatory manner.  

 I don't care about the race of who authors a law.  I care about what that law does.

 I think pro-choice is ok.

 The law reflects that.

 The law does not say abortions are to be mostly Black Americans, its just legalizes the procedure.

 Nothing about a pro-choice law increased the sexual activity of Black Americans so I can't see how the legalization caused more Black abortions.  It just caused more in a clinic setting and not in a basement somewhere.

 I still don't care if the author of a law is racist, I care only what that law does.  If Rowe had never been involved I would still think it's acceptable for an abortion to take place in a clinical setting.

"you will have to prove by supplying REAL data, NOT opinion pieces.
As I believe, that, the fact that their is  FREE  Abortions, with NO QUESTIONS ASKED,  has led to a  Increase in, Permissive Behavior, in ALL Races."

 Do you have REAL data on that or is the burden of proof one-sided here?

 For someone that won't even read the laws in his own state on the issue I am not going to pull up decades of AA birthing records by state and economic status.  You won't even look at the laws you argue about, you surely wont read a couple hundred pages of census material and verify the math, and if it's counter to what you want to believe people typically claim the information will be fake, inaccurate or ignore it.

 I do agree that no questions asked free abortions allow for a more casual view on the consequences of unprotected sexual activity, but given the massive amount of information available about adolescent sexual behavior alone, I don't think Johnny and Sally are going to stop the path of sexual intercourse to go get a condom because abortions became illegal.  There would be a combination of factors.

 All this being said, I agree with the law because of how the law works.  Not because I agree with the racism of one of the components that led to it.  The racism is irrelevant to me.

"Where do you stand on the fact that someone’s religious believe,
Believes that Abortions are Killing.
And those people are forced to pay for willy nilly, convince Abortions?
By Fed and  some State taxes."

 I believe if you do not like the way your taxes are used one should attempt to change that.  I also believe that a Democratic system of government means we will not always get what we want and will have to compromise.

 If abortion is legal and paid with state taxes where you live, and you don't agree with that you must get 51% of voters to get up, leave the house and overturn the tax allotment.  If 51% or more do not agree, then your taxes go towards the majority decision, since that's how Democracy works.

 The same thing applies on the national level but is considerable more complicated due to Medicaid/Medicare, private and public health insurance contracts, individual credentialed provider assessments and the huge gaps in sexual assault laws.  

 I don't have an issue with someone not wanting their taxes to go towards an abortion clinic.  That to me is no different than lobbying to not pay taxes to Federal healthcare systems because your religion doesn't allow the use of clinical care or physicians etc.  

 The issue is that making abortion clinically illegal doesn't address the murders, it just changes the locations.

"I ask for a answer to the question:
1. I Agree, that Taxes should be forced, on someone who believes it is Killing a Human, to have a, willy nilly, convince Abortion.
2. I do Not agree, "  "  "  ...
3. It's none of your, or anyone else's business."

 I don't have an opinion about anyone else's taxes.

 If only I had already said in the post prior: "I don't have an issue with someone not wanting their taxes to go towards an abortion clinic."

 I think clinical abortions are safer than basement ones, which end up in the public medical sector at extremely high cost, so I am ok with the current allotment of taxation in my state at this time.