Ok, I am not as some who profess how smart they are, but I find this:
I don't make my assessment of an abortion law, or any law, based off of the potential for racism, age, political affiliation, gender, financial status, ability to chew gum and walk, or other personal factors of the people who got it ratified. The humans involved will pass and be forgotten.
I care only about what the law says and how it works.In conflict with itself....
How can you "care" if you do not take the "potential" of its impact on others, into consideration, even if it is the sponsor, ratifier, or author of such policies is not your concern?
I am thinking you need to understand that position, upon what it was, and is, in order to grasp ALL OF IT.....
You have even stated about how our constitution is alive and amendable, which I agree with, because as we advance across the spectrum of understandings via technologies, sciences, and even societal, we need to keep up in order to accommodate, and utilize, that information, abilities, etc, to a better advantage.....yes?
Then why is her testimony not as important now, as it was then?
Am I making myself clear?
Pages: 1 
