Eegore wrote on 05/10/19 at 07:49:44:"They USE the
Terms of service agreement differently against different people. "
Yes they do.
Again this, to me, sounds like there is an expectation that Twitter let all users post anything they want, or they are violating the users 1st Amendment rights, or they are abusing that user.
This is fundamentally incorrect, and is equal to saying Fox news needs to let any guest on and also let them talk about anything they want.
The above post about content publishing is much, much closer to a real argument that can change things than going the abuse or 1st Amendment route.
Ok, personally I think when you restrict any type of commerce, and that is what twitter is, and then complain about it, is a circle argument.
Like Obama complained about the unfairness of FOX, etc, and Trump, about EVERYONE else
Just don't patronize.....that is the repair in our capitalistic society.
Now having said that Eegore, if you say twitter has the right to terms of agreement, then why can't a baker utilize the same defense in what he creates?