[/i][/b]
T And T Garage wrote on 03/28/19 at 13:53:34:
Paul’s replacement for the Affordable Care Act ...
How interesting that those were NOT, Paul Rand's personal statements.
LOL - no, it was just his proposal... Seriously, are you that thick??
But a TDS affected persons, 'OPINION', on the subject.
Yet when Rand, DOES say:
"...protect individuals with pre-existing conditions by giving them access to the group market..."The TDS affected tt, cannot read,
BECAUSE tt changes the subject, by saying; 'banning companies' !
On Ted Curz's, what was said was;
'Congress’ decision to eliminate tax penalties for not carrying health insurance - the so-called individual mandate - rendered much of the law invalid'.
Gee tt, ever read a contract, which says,
"...if one part of this contract is ruled invalid, that will not affect other parts of this contract..."Bamma Care Contract, does NOT say that.
So the argument is, one part is invalid, all is invalid.
Of course, the tt can NOT repeat:
"...Republican Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, has said there is “no way” Congress will repeal protections for people with pre-existing conditions and called the administration’s legal argument “far-fetched.”
“I didn’t hear a single senator say that they also thought they were repealing protections for people with pre-existing conditions,” Alexander said..."
Pages: 
