The title is an oxymoron.

I have to admit - I'm torn.  In one way, I want them to dismantle Obamacare.  On the other, I feel for the millions that were helped by it.

These morons (republicans) are still trying to dismantle Obamacare for no other reason that it's got his name on it.

They don't realize that if they succeed, they will pull the pre-existing condition exclusion and throw millions out of their packages.  This will literally kill someone.  Think about that.  It's completely within the realm of reason that children will die because of these morons (American children this time).

http://news.yahoo.com/trump-administration-escalates-legal-battle-against-oba...

"Tonight in federal court, the Trump Administration decided not only to try to destroy protections for Americans living with pre-existing conditions, but to declare all-out war on the health care of the American people," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday.

"Democrats will continue to fight relentlessly to protect people with pre-existing conditions and to deliver lower health costs and prescription drug prices for every American," she added.

 Bottom line is pre-existing condition exclusion is set to return.  Since the people who are pushing for the complete repeal process are not effected by the action there is little motive to maintain a regulation for comprehensive coverage.

 I've asked this several times on here and nobody has ever replied:

 What part of allowing pre-existing coverage denial is beneficial to the person paying for health insurance?  Why would anyone want private selection of what illnesses will be treated?

WebsterMark wrote on 03/27/19 at 10:08:33:



Talk is cheap.  Where's trump's "amazing" ACA replacement?

Speaking of bets...

What'll ya bet that this guy's in the maga crowd?

http://wokesloth.com/racist-customer-spanish-word-mexican-restaurant/jessi/?u...

Customer Goes On Racist Rant Over Spanish Words On A Mexican Menu

Serowbot wrote on 03/27/19 at 17:08:33:

 Next the Pub's will want to rename the taco and the burrito...

Would that be like the people that want to tear down statues, flags, and re-wright History ?

MnSpring wrote on 03/27/19 at 18:00:45:


No mn.  No one wants to rewrite (that's how you spell that word) history.

They don't want to pay homage to the Civil War "heros" or statues that were erected long after reconstruction to "put people in their place".

Educate yourself.

You're going to have to prove that's both their positions.

[/i][/b]T And T Garage wrote on 03/28/19 at 13:53:34:

Paul’s replacement for the Affordable Care Act ...

How interesting that  those were NOT, Paul Rand's personal statements.

But a TDS affected persons, 'OPINION', on the subject.

Yet when Rand, DOES say: "...protect individuals with pre-existing conditions by giving them access to the group market..."

The TDS affected tt, cannot read,
BECAUSE tt changes the subject,
by saying; 'banning companies' !

On Ted Curz's, what was said was;
'Congress’ decision to eliminate tax penalties for not carrying health insurance - the so-called individual mandate - rendered much of the law invalid'.

Gee tt, ever read a contract, which says, "...if one part of this contract is ruled invalid, that will not affect other parts of this contract..."
Bamma Care Contract, does NOT say that.
So the argument is, one part is invalid, all is invalid.

Of course, the tt can NOT repeat:
"...Republican Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, has said there is “no way” Congress will repeal protections for people with pre-existing conditions and called the administration’s legal argument “far-fetched.”
“I didn’t hear a single senator say that they also thought they were repealing protections for people with pre-existing conditions,” Alexander said..."