**Thread hijack intervention**

I'm not going to debate battery technology on a thread that started with a trump/Mueller investigation base.

If anyone feels the need to debate that issue, please start another thread.

Part of being better in "this cafe" is respecting the OP thread subject.

T And T Garage wrote on 04/01/19 at 10:33:18:

Don’t care what is posted.
Normal conversations change subjects all the time,
unless it is a closely regulated Debate.

So, Do NOT, get all  sanctimonious, and say:
“…I’m not going to debate battery technology…
Part of being better in “this cafe”…”

Had some time, waiting for something.
went through the thread,
and listed all the times, YOU,
changed the subject.
The other people, were responding to YOUR changes.

13,  you did just a Trump Bashing.
22, Lost turned to Abortion.
24, Lost bashing Conservatives.
30, you bashed Trump.
33, you quoted a, ‘what-about-ism’, and bashed Trump followers.
35, you bashed Trump, called Conservatives, Ignorant.
37, you bashed Trump, and WM.
39, you bashed Trump.
42, you bashed Trump, and me.
43, you bashed Trump, and WM
44, you posted another, what-about-ism.
47, you bashed Trump, and compared HRC to a Surgeon.
48, you bashed me.
50, you bashed me.
52, you bashed Trump, and defended HRC.
54, you bashed Trump, and WM.
59, you bashed Trump, and PG.
60, you bashed WM.
61, you bashed me, and,’you people’.
63, you bashed WM.
66, you bashed WM.
68, you bashed Trump, and WM.
71, you bashed me.
72, you bashed PG.
74, you defended AOC.
81, you bashed WM.
82, you bashed PG.
86, you bashed PG.
89, you bashed PG.
93, you bashed PG, and defended AOC.
96, you bashed Trump, and defend AOC.
100, you started, ‘carbon emissions’.
106, you bashed Trump, and PG.

And then the, ‘battery’ Conversation came about.

T And T Garage wrote on 04/01/19 at 13:24:41:

any and all bashing of that idiot is within the realm of fairness.

OK,  
Just don’t go ballistic when someone points out,
what DFI’s that AOC, B.S., A.F., K.E., Holder,
and many, many, many, others are.

And what UL, FDS, idiots they are.

Lastly, you seem to have way too much time on your hands….

LOLOL, I am retired. So sometimes I have a lot of time to post here.
Other times, not so much.

You on the other hand,
are posting far more than anybody on this Forum..
You say that you work someplace,
so it is clear, you are, Cheating, your employer,
out of the work you are paid to do.

Or does someone, pay you, to play ?

WebsterMark wrote on 04/01/19 at 10:13:09:


Okay, this battery complex powered 30,000 homes for one hour. That is orders of magnitude away from being a viable alternative to current power. Again, wasting time with this. Just build nuke plants.

We've managed just fine so far. New technology produces less waste. Store it in safe containers until we have a space elevator. Even if its 50 years, so what. Then take it up the elevator and send it into that ultimate incinerator 93 million miles away.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 04/02/19 at 06:08:43:

Check out bikini atoll, the salt water has detox'd the radioactivity.
It still remains on the island so don't go living there or you'll glow but you can eat the fish.

Nuclear energy is the most feasible answer; however, it has some large obstacles to overcome.  The cost to build new plants is extraordinarily high, well into the billions.  The two biggest problems are the waste.  It is not feasible to properly store the heavy water even though facilities have been built.  The lawyers tie that up, not in my back  yard.  How are you going to transport it?  There are only two known permanent storage facilities in the country.  The $hit is sitting in tanks above ground.


Best regards,