Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Poor litte Adam (Read 14 times)
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 12809

Gender: male
Poor litte Adam
03/14/19 at 05:42:20
 
From CNN no less.

Finally, poor Adam Schiff, the hapless chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, watched his own credibility circle the drain: Now he is dutifully toeing Pelosi's line by pooh-poohing impeachment -- and this after leading the collusion mob for the past

He now says Pelosi is "absolutely right." But what has he been saying for the last two years about the issue of Russian collusion? Let's take a walk down memory lane:

Schiff said that evidence of Russian collusion is "in plain sight," on February 17 of this year, and that the evidence of collusion was "pretty compelling." On March 3, Schiff said there is "direct evidence" of collusion. One year ago, Schiff said he had "ample evidence." He has also said there was "plenty of evidence."

But on Monday, he was reduced to the pathetic statement that impeachment "isn't a good idea ... in the absence of graphic evidence."
What is the difference between "graphic" evidence and that which is plenty, compelling, direct, ample and found in plain sight? I guess Schiff has a different experience with words than the rest of us.

For two years, Schiff has raced from network green room to network green room with his claim to have the goods on Comrade Trump. Now, Americans are left with the obvious question: “Was the President openly and willingly colluding with Russia – which is most likely an impeachable offense – or were you lying?”
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
03/28/24 at 14:44:02



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Poor litte Adam


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.