Read it and THINK about why you are determined to ignore reason.

http://memepoliceman.com/list-of-mass-shootings-stopped-by-armed-civilians/

Are teachers Not smart enough to be cops?
Why would teachers, trained and qualified at the range, be less likely to or less able to protect their students?
Who did the investigation in Broward country and determined that it would be a good idea to allow teachers to arm themselves?
Wasn't that a government study??
Why are they wrong?
Stop stamping your little foot and explain WHY you believe what you believe. I've explained why teachers should be as good as cops, who, incidentally, DO add more guns to the event, and should be able to defend the children.
Explain why I am wrong.

Serowbot wrote on 12/22/18 at 10:56:45:

Thousands of accidental deaths, domestic rage shootings, and suicides are a small price to pay to prevent a lighting strike.

Wait, just a minuet, not to long ago,
you were screaming (like)  
'The Sky Is Falling'.

Now, you equate the School shootings as a, ' lighting strike'.
(BTY, more likely to get hit by lightening in MN, than a rattlesnake in AZ)

Also saying, 'Thousands of accidental deaths,'  
(which is so totally NOT TRUE)
is Not, Selling, FEAR ?

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 12/22/18 at 10:35:29:


Say how much you want reasoned debate again.


And, why should teachers Not have the right to self defense?

Why do these shootings occur so predominantly in
No Gun Zones?
Wouldn't logic dictate that
No Gun Zones are a magnet for crazies who want to kill a buncha people?

Answer the questions, democrats.

Serowbot wrote on 12/22/18 at 07:36:44:



Don't forget to notify Australia too!

T And T Garage wrote on 12/22/18 at 14:09:50:

 You're wrong because you just say that

Purdy much the same as you believe about Trump.
You're wrong because you just say that

If someone else, said, ’that’,
Get Out those Knee Pads !