The same amount of global warming events have happened as the amount of Government strike teams have come into our homes and taken our guns.

 I'd look at it scientifically, but since we use selective data, only the ones we care about, it makes little sense to have an adult discussion about it.

 I lost.  Easy for me to say because I don't see this as a fight on some motorcycle forum, but a discussion among two adults.  I don't win discussion, I partake in them.

 If your understanding of Posse Comitatus is correct then why is every person, including the President using it incorrectly?  Why is the current management of our military not being used as if this is a foreign invasion?  Why are they referencing Posse Comitatus when enacting orders, and why is it being applied the way it is now?  

 I know why Posse Comitatus was implemented, but the empirical evidence, you know, how its being used right now, is different.  

 You have an expectation that we look at things "scientifically" while you do not have that expectation of yourself.  It's just hard to have a conversation when you get to hand-pick data and we do not, you do this regularly.

 For instance you will argue about the President and 1st Amendment rights regarding his online communications but if its about Twitter you immediately dismiss it because you "don't care" about his Twitter.  How are you looking at it scientifically, which you expect from us, if you select information based off of your opinion of it?

Eegore wrote on 11/25/18 at 07:31:29:

 I lost.  Easy for me to say because I don't see this as a fight on some motorcycle forum, but a discussion among two adults.  I don't win discussion, I partake in them.
 If your understanding of Posse Comitatus is correct then why is every person, including the President using it incorrectly?  Why is the current management of our military not being used as if this is a foreign invasion?  Why are they referencing Posse Comitatus when enacting orders, and why is it being applied the way it is now?  
 I know why Posse Comitatus was implemented, but the empirical evidence, you know, how its being used right now, is different.  
 You have an expectation that we look at things "scientifically" while you do not have that expectation of yourself.  It's just hard to have a conversation when you get to hand-pick data and we do not, you do this regularly.
 For instance you will argue about the President and 1st Amendment rights regarding his online communications but if its about Twitter you immediately dismiss it because you "don't care" about his Twitter.  How are you looking at it scientifically, which you expect from us, if you select information based off of your opinion of it?

 “…It’s just hard to have a conversation when you get to hand-pick data and we do not, you do this regularly…”

Due to the content of the post,“…you get to …”, could refer to JOG.

Can you describe, who is,
“…we do not…”
In post # 18

"It's not
If you have to choose between giving up guns or having your dikk cut off.."

 I see what you mean.  Why choose self-mutilation instead of choosing to give up my vehicle.

"It makes as much sense as you cutting your dikk off because someone else is raping people."

 I agree.  However I still think comparing bodily mutilation to surrendering an object is less accurate than comparing surrendering one object, and another.

 I assume that's a pretty obvious opinion I have, but I am not exhausted so I will clarify further:

 You describe the criminal act of using a gun to commit homicide and in correlation someone who does not commit crimes equal to or worse than homicide that would CHOOSE to turn over their personally owned firearm to a third unnamed party.

 I have compared someone who engages in the criminal act of homicide by use of a firearm to someone who would CHOOSE to give up another object, similar to a person who would CHOOSE to give up their truck because too many people die in automobile vehicular homicide.

 I make this comparison because I believe that comparing bodily mutilation to physical object surrendering is less similar than an object to object comparison even if those comparisons are not specifically linked to the same event.

 This is my opinion of how comparison factors work an can be perceived by others, I can explain it further if you like.

 I have a different opinion regarding how to compare inanimate objects and self mutilation, that's it.  I don't know why it bothers you, or why you think I don't understand your post.

 I agree with you.  That's the third time I've said that.

 I just compare things differently.