#WINNING

@Mn,

You do this every time, every single time a valid point is made about Trump's egregious and deliberately trolling antics are pointed out, you'll search for some instance, any instance where Hilary, or Obama, (curiously never Bush) have done something that in your mind somehow excuses anything Trump does.

You pay no attention to degree, or to purpose or to due process it's only ever about finding something, anything that makes it all OK. It's 'whataboutism' taken to bizarre extremes.

For example Trump has shown a definite neurological disorder with his slurring of words, of which there are numerous instances recorded and you counter all that with one instance of Obama 10 years ago saying 57 instead of 50. What he in fact meant to say was 47 for reasons you can look up if you're interested. A slip of the tongue is not signs of degenerative neurological disorder.

I notice you never point to Obama's aggressive attitude to curbing illegal immigration. For example... Donald Trump is deporting fewer people than Barack Obama didhttps://www.economist.com/united-states/2017/12/14/donald-trump-is-deporting-...

However back onto the thread topic, no President is going to be always happy with aggressive or tough questions from the press but to simply call a question 'stupid' or 'that is such a racist thing to say' or to simply randomly try to ban a reporter you don't like for the most nebulous and spurious of reasons like 'insufficient decorum'. And then use a blatantly doctored tape to frame the ban with a false narrative, is something that even Nixon at his worst did not do, and he was famously testy.

Acosta is rude, childish and in no way Deserves the Privilege of Access to the White House.

thumperclone wrote on 11/18/18 at 13:58:46:

------- is rude, childish and in no way Deserves the Privilege of Access to the tall table.    

Ya know Clone. In Lew of Serowbot's, 'Rodney King', style of Moderating.
Perhaps you could say, in front of whatever you post.
"In My Opinion".

In fact, 'in my opinion', in my opinion, should go in front of, every post.

That way, when someone calls someone a,
"Moronic, Bat $hit, Crazy, lazy, pwned, insane, idiotic, imbecile"
If they put, 'In My Opinion", in front of that.

It would make Bot SO  HAPPY !

thumperclone wrote on 11/18/18 at 15:00:26:

imo is a given in this kind of forum

Always thought so.
Yet some are now saying, (to the effect), ‘if you do not believe …, than you are a …”

the mods are providing a thankless service:
a sometimes futile attempt to keep things civil
I know they are, well aware of that.

if trump has done anything its the division of our ALREADY GREAT AMERICA,
I don’t think so. I believe, if their is a division, it is mostly fabricated by those Dem/Rep/Ind people, who are finding it harder to line their pockets. And the Media, which is so strongly anti-Trump, Because it lined their pocket, because the UL’s Pay them.
It is slowly changing, (the media), see the stations, working to be more accountable, getting back to, ’news’, ‘opinion’, and stating up front, and louder, they are two different things.

which is sorrily over apparent at the tall table
I don’t think the T.Table  is a actual representation, of the real world.

I took a pledge to be more civil and have backslid more than once
at least I try
Good for you !

maybe you could also?
I am, when someone is civil to me.
When someone is NOT civil to me,
I do NOT, turn the other cheek.
(Some believe it is a flaw)
If you also think it is, well then
get over yourself or move on

Serowbot wrote on 11/18/18 at 15:44:23:


So just to get this straight.
YOU, can say: ' have his tantrum'
2 others can say, all sorts of names.
And it's perfectly OK.
Yet, "Referring to other members as he/she is now banned"
Just let me write that down.

"I have noticed that when I call out Liberal members here, they apologize and promise to try to do better"
In My Opinion, that is because, they do NOT, do what they 'Promised' to do.
Because they KNOW they don't have to. 
And you believe their 'crocodile' tears.

"When I call out Conservatives, they just get whiny and complain that I'm mean"
Could it be, that they are telling the TRUTH !
And pointing out the huge, disparities, as 'who' can do, 'what' !

"No whatabouts"
Explain this, does that mean that when one side, (or media) says something. The other side, (or media) cannot produce a contrary opinion ?
Also if no, "No whatabouts", will that be enforced equally ?
Or will it, 'depend' ?

thumperclone wrote on 11/18/18 at 16:14:54:

if you are not mature enough to see the obvious attacks you post maybe you could take a step back and reread b4 you hit the post button

Ah, YEA, any part of what I have said, you don't understand ?
A-Yep, I have, and WILL, 'attack' those that attack me.

Gee, another disparity, eds can do/say that.
But I cannot ?

reread your muppet post  lets see if you get it

Yes I get it !