Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Maybe the supreme court didn't agree (Read 29 times)
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Maybe the supreme court didn't agree
10/31/18 at 18:18:18
 
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9011
Minn
Gender: male
Re: Maybe the supreme court didn't agree
Reply #1 - 11/01/18 at 06:07:49
 
justin_o_guy2 wrote on 10/31/18 at 18:18:18:


Well since the piece about 'Anchor' Babies, was slipped in:
" this alleged right derives only from a footnote slyly slipped into a Supreme Court opinion by Justice Brennan in 1982. You might say it stuck in when no one was looking"

Just like a 8-7/8th month pregnant woman, sneaks Illegally into this country, has a baby on this soil, that clams Citizenship for the child, and get's welfare for  herself, for the next 18 YEARS.

It is absolutely clear, that the 14th,
 NEEDS To  Be Re-Written !


After all, it is Very clear, this was to override, the possible fact that the newly freed Slaves, would not be granted Citizenship.

At the time it was written, their were no,  Illegals, looking for FREE, this and that, by sneaking in , and having 'Anchor' Babies.

It is only right to correct that mistake, in a modern time, by a 'civilized' Nation.







Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: Maybe the supreme court didn't agree
Reply #2 - 11/01/18 at 06:24:40
 
It doesn't need rewritten.
The people reading it need to be honest about what it was meant to do.
Nobody has such an obviously idiotic immigration policy as to reward someone for illegally entering their country if they can manage to squirt out a baby.
It's beyond idiocy. It's economic suicide.
Flood the labor market, drive down wages.
Overload the social safety nets , drive up taxes.
Economic Law will not be broken.
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
LostArtist
Ex Member




Re: Maybe the supreme court didn't agree
Reply #3 - 11/01/18 at 14:29:08
 
actually,

in 1898:
United States v. Wong Kim Ark

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
verslagen1
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Online

Where there's a
will, I want to be
in it.

Posts: 28790
L.A. California
Gender: male
Re: Maybe the supreme court didn't agree
Reply #4 - 11/01/18 at 14:49:56
 
LostArtist wrote on 11/01/18 at 14:29:08:
actually,

in 1898:
United States v. Wong Kim Ark


Which is actually...
Quote:
For a hundred years, that was how it stood, with only one case adding the caveat that children born to LEGAL permanent residents of the U.S., gainfully employed, and who were not employed by a foreign government would also be deemed citizens under the 14th Amendment. (United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898.)


This measure seems rational as a legal resident has the potential to becoming a citizen.
Whereas a illegal has no potential.
Back to top
 
 
WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/19/24 at 14:57:21



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › Maybe the supreme court didn't agree


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.