Or dyno charts for Savage cams or reviews from people who have changed cams?

I understand the DR cam as ground from the factory is not a good match for the savage, but the 90-95 cam can be used as a blank welded and reground by Webcam or through Lancer.

Thanks for the link Dave!  Interesting read did DBM or anyone else do a dyno run?

DBM did do a dino ,the result was 33.5 max hp out of the DR cam with an otherwise stock engine. This rings true as the largest increase in hp comes from increased displacement and/ or compression ratio , a cam is like icing on the cake ,it will maximize the increase of a piston change but doesn't create much hp used alone .(2.5 hp in DBM's case)

Fast 650 , I don't think a larger exhaust pipe  would have helped. Does a 2"pipe make more hp than a 1.5 "pipe ? no it doesn't ! it is more important to keep velocity(flow) up in the exhaust pipe , it is after all being pushed out by the pressure of the expanded gases and the piston rising . DBM 's use of the DR cam may have increased the compression slightly, but not enough to require a larger pipe and one might have actually reduced Hp gains.

See my post titled "Stage I Dyno Results".  I did the post on 6/21/18 (I think).  With some simple mods and the DR cam, horsepower increased 11.3% (30.1 to 33.5) and torque increased 20.6% (31.8 to 38.4).  The power band was expanded significantly.  It ran quite a bit better, and the investment was minimal.

I'm a bit uncomfortable with the absence of the oiling holes in the lobes.  I think I have about 800 miles on it now and will be opening it up to adjust valves and visually inspect the cam lobes.  I'll let you know what I find.

Opinion: Its an inexpensive part the yields a nice little kick.  It really compliments a less restrictive intake and exhaust.  It has some overlap and TDC lift so you get a little exhaust action helping to pull in the incoming charge. Now it has a sweet spot right at freeway speed (about 60 mph over here).  So far, no complaints.  Works good.  We'll see how the inspection goes.  

I don't  think our header pipe is a 1.25" . I believe it's 1.3".(15.5% larger than a 1.25)

My bad on the 1.25" ID.  I got sloppy there.  The stock header is actually 1.27" ID (measured at both ends with a snap gage and micrometer).  The port is 1.30" ID.

How did you get 15.5% larger Batz?  I calculate the cross section of a 1.25" diameter to be 1.23 square inches, and the cross section of a 1.30" diameter to be 1.33 square inches.  That works out to the 1.30" diameter being 108% larger than of the 1.25" diameter.  There I go getting sloppy again.  Not 108% larger, 8% larger.
 I know its a mute point since the actual header pipe is really 1.27", but I want to make sure I understand your approach and how you got the 15.5% value.
Hey Fast 650, at what RPM do you get 300 fps on a 1.27" ID?  With my current setup, I'm running in the area of about 4200 to 4500 when I blast the freeway.  Maybe that's why I'm likin the 1.5".