This means nothing without historical figures from the past and you should know that. The article didn't provide figures from the past as a means to judge any significance. Wonder why?  I can show where there are socialists (remember Nazi Germany was socialist) are running for office now but that doesn't mean anything without data from previous years either.

And so what if nuts are running in greater numbers? Extremists from both sides are emboldened. It would only be a genuine issue when the mainstream of one of the Parties supports them and frankly, the left is far more likely to go in that direction. Mainstream Republicans would never support a Klan member (Dems did, remember?) but mainstream Dems are supporting soft socialist now.

That's f'ing nonsense. Trump is not a closet KKK racist extremist. Get real If so, pretty funny caused he's hired plenty of blacks in his life.

He's got a different take on things than you do so you call him a racist rather than confront the realities of today's world.

If I find a report showing black on white crime increaded during Obama's term,(which I'll bet was the case)  would you also assume he was one of those pushing for violent confrontation against whites? No, and I wouldn't expect you to.

None of those things apply to Trump.

For one thing, anti-semitism is a problem on the left, not the right and
eugenics was the original sin of the lefts favorite "not for profit" Planned Parenthood which has done more to lower the black population than anyone else could have imagined.

As was recently seen in #sidewalksusie (look it up if you're on twitter), the left seems to have an awful lot of closet racist.