Serowbot wrote on 04/07/18 at 11:18:58:


And still no reply as to why?
Then I will assume under your reasoning ALL armed forces, be it military, FBI, local police forces, to body guards for liberal politicians and Hollywood personalities, are designed for killing.

Sounds stupid, huh.....  

Guns are designed, other than hunting, if used as intended, to guard against the forces who want to kill, others.
If not, then those liberals politicians and Hollywood folk are what, stupid, as they are NOT using the gun to protect?

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 04/07/18 at 14:30:01:



find where I said anything about limiting who's armed and who's not?  

again, you're profiling me into a category I don't belong in.

what I was trying to point out is, if you want to arm teachers, aren't you making them into armed government stooges?  

the only other thing you might have been able to read into what I said was, oh, hey, some liberals don't want ANYONE armed, not even government stooges as you put it.  

and that's it, don't jump to some other conclusion or that I want only government people to be armed or that I'm a "gun grabber"  

This idea that I was proposing gun grabbing or that only government stooges should be armed came from YOU, not ME.  You read what you wanted into what I said.

So if we could all quit doing that, maybe we could have some decent conversations here.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 04/07/18 at 16:16:55:



there are plenty of private companies that ban guns too...  

there are A LOT of our constitutional RIGHTS that we can't exercise all over the place, both private and government places