Serowbot wrote on 04/04/18 at 10:59:20:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/police-reportedly-found-questioned-nasim-08403..."
Police in California reportedly contacted and questioned Nasim Aghdam, the suspect in the YouTube shooting, early in the morning on the day of the attack.
Aghdam didn't appear to be a threat to herself or others, Nelson told the Associated Press. Nelson would not tell the AP whether officers had been warned that Aghdam might have been headed to YouTube headquarters. "
So if another place, said this:
“…The Mountain View department had not passed on any information about Aghdam to police in San Bruno, where YouTube’s headquarters is located, before the shooting, the San Bruno police chief said….”https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/nasim-najafi-aghdam-youtub...It would Not be important, that the shooter could have, LIED?
And a phone call to youtube, to tell them her name/photo,
could Not be done, because they were so sensitive about her, 'rights'.
youtube/google, DOES, have MORE information on people, than the Police.
If they were called, and if they did research,
Perhaps, they they could have, locked the doors,
if 'they' thought it was appropriate.
OH.Would not this, Subject be Better named:
“Bias in the News…." and/or put their.
Or perhaps, This thread could be, put in Both Places.
(as their are so MANY people, that read this Forum) Some just, ‘may’, get confused !