Eegore wrote on 03/24/18 at 07:50:37: "A tradeoff between free speech and safety and having an informed community"
First if we are going to quote we should use all of the actual words said. But its close enough.
What's wrong with what he's saying in context, not that hacked up version above?
Hes saying that if we allow free speech that's obvious hate speech AND fake propaganda in the medium that is now Facebook then the trade off is having less accurate information dispersed and that could be dangerous.
How is this inaccurate?
Its the pitfall of free speech.
When you use public education, airwaves, etc, to propagandize, you know as fact, your behavior is dishonest and disingenuous.
Our advertising campaigns of product is ripe with results.
You have children that can't afford 3 squares a day, but they must have a certain tennis shoe or they feel inferior.
The ones lying, using Facebook, etc, to promote a candidate, agenda, etc, know darn well they stretch the truth, in doing so, and like a man who cheats on his wife, the first thing he suspects when she is late at getting home, she is having a affair.....
So these disingenuous promoters think their opposition is doing exactly what they are, but cry foul.....
We saw this with the recent mining of information using the internet, claiming Trump used it, only to see Obama had before....haha!
Pages: 1
