https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMr7vaJJXGI its a YouTube, so click on it and watch it
As they peer deeper into the various Deep Field "empty spots" with better orbital telescopes and new Muse ground combined light and radio telescope techniques, they are seeing things that ARE MUCH MUCH further away (and project much much further back in time based on the speed of light) than they had originally calculated the big bang origin time to be (based upon a constant expansion coefficient and a constant speed of light).
They now know that the expansion coefficient is variable and suspect that the speed of light may actually change slightly due to matter density and that
the rate of expansion of space time can take place at rates of millions of times the speed of light.
The original Deep Field has been joined by 6 other places where you can peer in deep -- in diametrically different directions too. Thus, the size of Everything has increased by several whole multiple thousands of times just lately. The killer is that the better eyes still see the same density of stuff out there still, so that is pushing back the thought that they were seeing infant galaxies that are just barely pre-bang ---- and the scientists are sorta unhappy at seeing Big Bang Theory disrupted like that. They liked the Big Bang, it was all neat and all inclusive -- but it was just wrong just like many other theories.
This is forcing thoughts on 1) its all been around much longer than we thought before 2) speed of expansion is INCREASING as the expansion density is decreasing or mebbe the speed of light constant can vary based on the changes in the general curvature of space getting different as "star density" decreases due to expansion or 3)
we need some sort of new type of Big Bang theory that better fits all these new facts.
They are beginning to say that space-time itself expanded much much faster than the speed of light very early on, and it is still clocking expansion rates far greater than the speed of light out at the edges of things.
And on top of that, space time is folded like a blanket, multiple layers of folds. With black holes (worm holes) going in between the layers. They are still looking for a puking exit hole as they see lots and lots and lots and lots of entry holes but no exit holes.
And yup, dark matter and dark energy are still just a set of theoretical fudges created to make it all work out mathematically, nobody has ever really found any "dark matter" nor even any dark particles and they can't even agree on what dark energy supposedly does. The big colliders have failed to make a single particle or wave or anything "dark matter" related.
Gravity isn't considered a simple force any more, it is local changes in the curvature of space-time. This is why Gravitational Lens effects take place on light from stacked stars is bent by the near star and you can use that to see the little sub-bumps that are the planets "little bitty gravitational lens effects".
Gravitational lensing is not new, it has been around a while. It is being used to detect planets around stars that can already be seen by existing telescopes. Now that the gravitational lensing trick can be computer automated to look repeatedly at all known "stacked stars" they are scanning the near galaxies for earthlike planets orbiting these stacked stars as "first stops to go to" once we have a good enough way to get there. We have found 10s of thousands of various size and distance planets orbiting the known stacked stars and have found 11 planets so far that are inside the Goldilocks Zone (habitable temp zones) that also give a hydrogen/nitrogen/oxygen/carbon primary content signature to their light. They think hydrogen/oxygen at that temperature can mean liquid water, and oxygen that is free from nitrogen and carbon means some form of life is separating them as it metabolizes.
Guys, remember back when we were in elementary school? 9 planets around our own sun was it, we were missing an entire bottom row off the periodic table, 2-4 galaxies existed in space making up a universe of known finite size? Known age of everything,
5.4 13.78 billion years since the Big Bang ????
During our lifetimes we have watched the huge debate about Big Bang vs Constant Expanding/Contracting Universe "resolved" by use of better telescopes, now new techniques and better/bigger scopes both on the ground and in space have opened all these settled debates back up with brand new information that busts up the current "settled thoughts".
Scientists say now that it takes the energy and "time to develop" of
very old exploding stars (nova strength or better) to make up some of the elements that are found on earth, so we personally are made up of stuff (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen) that has gone through at least one or two stellar generations. The gold in my wedding band is a post supernova residue ..... the really big stars pop really really hard when they age out and most of the goodies produced goes down the black hole that instantly forms anyway (and where exactly does that down the black hole matter go, ie how did my gold get recycled?).
I can remember age of the universe being pegged at
5.4 13.77 billion years since Big Bang and that idea has just been plain contradicted by so many things we have found out since then that the age has gotten changed twice.
IT IS ALL BASED ON WHAT SCIENTISTS THINK and they are constantly having to rethink things based upon what they now know "post discovery".
Human "knowledge" is expanding by doubling every 3 years and I think it expands again by replacement due to new theories being proposed and accepted every 20-50 years.
Newtonian Physics (gravity as a force) is now totally disproven and has been replaced by curved space effects. Light was a wave, now it is a quanta of energy that can behave like a wave or like a particle, depending on circumstances (like how you are detecting it).
Current Example: LENR is stumbling across new radiation and electromagnetic "strange effects" that can cause steel and aluminum to soften and change over relatively short distances and over short periods of near exposure and go right through lead and other dense materials like they are not there. Effects are distance controlled though, they don't propagate very far.
Questions and more questions -- propagate through WHAT exactly? How? Like Gravity and Magnetism, the new strange effects stuff is inverse square law distance limited apparently.Think of poor Marie Curie and how she found out about the effects of radioactive emissions from radium, the hard way. Both she and Rossi have had to wear a wig in public towards the end because their hair all fell out .....
The Hadron Collider people are saying to the Rossi experimenters "You found WHAT ??? That effect requires electron beam strengths of xxx,000,000 joules to create in the Large Hadron chamber and you are seeing it on a table top in your garage using wall socket power ????? You sir, are nuts ...."
Science is constantly being disrupted now-a-days and all the old gray beards who run the universities and major labs are resisting all this change just as much as they can, as they are becoming mentally "out of date/ignorant" yearly and their egos simply can't take it. Their august positions are also at risk from forced retirement due to "not being up to current knowledge standards" and they don't like that idea at all either .....
Always Remember, AC power can't possibly work because the electrons just jiggle back and forth and they don't go very far in their jiggle motions. AC is really only useful for electrocuting old circus elephants. Those bicycle shop boys are nuts, that thing can NEVER fly. Sure, its safe to let the kids follow close behind the mosquito fogger truck on their bicycles, it's just a very dilute mist of water, DDT and some Chlordane -- much lighter than what you spray on your apple tree or your vegetable gardens. Lighter than a can of Raid by a long shot, them skeeters are really easy to kill compared to a cockroach ..... Change, she comes .......