Or maybe it will just be more crumbs, like Nannie P say.

I don't think its the person Tweeter folk adore, nope, as every single attack, and prediction, of his boat sinking has not brought about such results.

Absolutely this type of incessant assault has brought down others....

Not him to date.

That is why I think its not "him".

The libs can pound on him till their fist a bloody pulp, but it won't provide any answers to what they need to do to win.

They better listen to party members who say they need ideas, to run on, Hollywood elitism and their circle jerking award programs of Resistance....

Ain't it.

I believe they are the reason why, after winning elections, getting a majority out of the gate, with Clinton and Obama, folks quickly jerked back that power, upon the very first midterms.....

You can blow it off, and repeat, and rinse, again....

It ain't Trump!    

edit: BTW, he has improved in almost every poll, this memo, like you libs say, nothin-burger, only those who swill it with kool-aid, seem to care.

but "I aint' Obama" worked for the republicans while Obama was in office.... so why not for democrats?

I think you are assuming too much here.

Go back and look at the demographics of who voted for Obama, in his first term, many of the same folks who voted for Trump.

Explain to me why he lost his majority after the midterms?

I think this is not the Tea Party folk, no, but the same basic folk who might have elected Ross Perot if he had stayed in.

The middle is getting larger, while the extremes are shrinking.
The conservative zealots have caused havoc by trying to drag it more right, but they are not nearly as well "armed" as the left wing liberals of Hollywood, etc, that cause its leadership to be pulled left.

The vocals do all the shouting, the middle elects the winner.  

Serowbot wrote on 02/02/18 at 16:10:19:


Yup Yup!!

Did Hillary tell you that  

raydawg wrote on 02/02/18 at 19:18:49:

Nope - our president's poll numbers did!