batman wrote on 01/24/18 at 16:40:33:CRISY ,I DON'T BELIEVE YOU REDSIGNED YOUR BIKE ! YOU FOLLOWED IN THE PROVEN FOOTSTEPS OF OTHERS . WHAT MAKES YOU A BRAIN TRUST? BRAKING A NEW MOTOR IN BY CRUSING IT AT 75 ON THE HIGHWAY! DAH! IF THE YOU WERE FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE ,YOU COULD READ THE POSTING RULES FOR THIS SITE THAT SAY PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE A NO,NO. AND IF YOU READ THE SITE-XCCELERATION.COM CR-BOOST 101-AND YOU HAD SUFFICIENT READING COMPREHENSION YOU WOULD FIND THAT ALL OF THE NUMBERS I QUOTED CAME NOT OUT OF THIN AIR,BUT FROM PUBLISHED DATA. YOUR OPINION OF ME DOESN'T CHANGE THE TRUTH!
Huh?
Dood... What?
I think you misunderstood my point in quoting your post...
You were not the troll I was referencing...
Did I allude that I redesigned anything on my bike?
Did I state something that was incorrect? I kind of felt like I was being supportive of the sane majority among posters in this thread.
The point of me quoting your post was to allude that your very well organized and thought out information was falling on deaf ears.
And once again...
An oversized bore is an oversized bore.
no amount of gentle ring seating is going to take up .0085" of slack per side between the piston and jug.
After close enough to 200 miles into break in... the 10-15 seconds it took me to gently accelerate to traffic speed would never have been an issue save for the slack in the bore. Hence why Bill came out of pocket to resleeve my jug and rework it. The difference in how it feels, runs, pulls, and sounds are unmistakable.
Is it advisable to run above 55 mph during break in? Of course not...
How many of these engines are still out there thumping and pumping after being whipped like a dog right out of the box? Probably a heck of a lot more still running than failed. 'Muricans are not known for our restraint... Do you really believe Suzuki would have been successful with a product that could not stand up to good 'ol 'Murican bravado?
Remember what this bike was designed to compete with...
And just one more time for reiteration -
My "attack" was in no way a reference to you Batz.
I thought it had become evident that I do respect your input, even when I may disagree.