justin_o_guy2 wrote on 10/04/17 at 21:33:55:
If you plan on riding, get two.
A nice one to ride and a cosmetically challenged one to build
When I went searching for a bike for a cafe conversion I set out to find a running, unloved rat. That's what I found and in short order I was unhappy with my search criteria. The bike I found was a'95 with 2,600 miles. It was adult-female owned and never ridden hard. But when it wasn't ridden, it was stored in a metal shed with a dirt floor on the NJ Shore - a wet salty environment. Here's why a "cosmetically challenged" bike is a false economy:
The finish on all of the clear coated aluminum parts (wheel hubs, engine cases, fork sliders, handlebar controls, t-clamps, directional mounts....) was damaged. I thought I could simply clean these parts up and they'd look new again, but I was oh so wrong. I had to remove the remaining clear coat and hand polish everything. It was a gigantic PIA.
The few chromed parts that were reused for the build (fork stanchions, headlight) were pitted. I brought these back to life with steel wool and WD-40, but once again, I was polishing instead of building. The head light bucket was replaced with a 7" unit and I've been looking for replacement forks for some time now. I will settle for nothing less then forks in perfect condition.
My frame was rough. Not only did I have to paint the cut modifications, but I found all sorts of places that required touch up. The swing arm was in such bad condition that I had it powder coated (it now looks beautiful).
There was a dent in my tank. This didn't concern me at first. In fact, RYCA hammered most of it out during the tank modification. But it still required body work. Time and money.
I spent more time polishing and repairing then I did actually building. Knowing what I know now, I'd start off with a beautiful bike...and build a better looking bike from it. My "cheap" rat bike probably cost me an additional $1,000. I would have gladly spent that up front if I knew the amount of effort involved.