batman wrote on 08/14/17 at 16:19:59:JOG,I believe you'll be waiting a long time. I don't think that idea is sound. Finding a spring of proper strength, in a size small enough to fit in the area, will prove almost impossible. The fact that the softer metal of the tensioner body has to slide back and forth against the mounting stud and the snap ring ,might also cause damage and metal grit entering the oil system.If the new spring is to weak the tensioner will be pushed back against the stud and act as it did ,if the spring is to strong,the pawl will advance ,but when the cylinder expands will the tension of the chain on the back side be strong enough to move the tensioner back ? If not ,there will be no gain either way.
Slightly disagree. I am not sure how the tensioner moving back and forth will create any such wear. Since the tensioner is under constant spring pressure from both sides, it is not just "flopping" back and forth.
Probably, if I had mine to do over, I would have thinned the tensioner mounting lug slightly - the same amount as the thickness of a washer that I would put on after the tensioner, but before the circlip just to make sure that the moving tensioner didn't work the circlip off the mount pin.
Next time I have cover off, I will do that.
See my previous post about what I did, and how it has worked up to now.