MnSpring wrote on 08/06/17 at 17:54:26:justin_o_guy2 wrote on 08/06/17 at 16:45:52:
See, clone, I've studied..
Have you?
Do you, 'Really’, expect,
Bots, ‘Bot’s, to Read, Learn, Understand ?????
Now, That’s, ’Tin Foil Hat’, area !
I never seemed to get my question answered by him..... not sure why.
Maybe I can jack this thread and ask you guys the question.
He stated misinformation was intentionally given to students/folks, and told it was truth.
He then stated that these subjects believed this information, and even increased its value, 10 fold.....
As they built their belief around it.
Now, they were in essence, blind to the truth, so to speak.
He stated this study was above reproach, as he vouched for their integrity, etc.
I asked if the study was judged, scrutinized, on the same criteria of false data installed, to reach a conclusion desired.....
All I got was crickets.
Can you guys help me here....
Is my question too vague, without merit, ambiguous, or what?
Do you guys understand it?
I see this as the same paradox of folks rejecting freedom of speech, association, beliefs, personal rights, etc, to some, with the claim its because these people beliefs, activities, etc, exhibit intolerance.....
HUH....