Hey, as long as he DIDN'T KNOW HE WAS DIVULGING SECRET information, then it's okay, Remember?

Serowbot wrote on 05/16/17 at 16:01:34:

So you have no decent response but instead of saying ok you got me I don't know, you just hit me with a whatever and a cop out about defending Trump. Come on man I even said if he did do what they said I didn't agree with it and I would agree it was wrong. I'm man enough to admit I'm wrong when I am. The cop outs and childish responses when proven wrong are why liberals aren't taken serious.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 05/16/17 at 17:28:05:

When Saint Hillary , Noble Liar of Washington D.C. was accused her defenders here pointed out that unless it could be proven that she willfully chose to break the law, it was not a crime.   Trump wasn't briefed, so he COULDN'T have known. Gee, no paragraphs marked with a C when you are just talking.. The level of hypocrisy you people can be comfortable in is amazing.. Really, people? Don't remember the crap you called reasonable just months ago?

Really, people? Don’t remember the crap you called reasonable just months ago?

That is  the  ABSOLUTELY, ASTOUNDING  PART !!!!!!!!!!  

2007,  I said a candidate was  NOT   Fitted for the Job.
No, discussion, Just;
 “YOU ARE Raciest”  
    “YOU are,  Predigest”
       etc, etc, etc.

In 2011, I said the same thing, but added, ’See what he has done”
     No Discussion, just;
  “YOU ARE Raciest”  
 “YOU are,  Predigest”
       etc, etc, etc.

Ya know what?
  Didn’t,  Stand in the Street and  CRY.
     (Nor did anybody I know of)

Today, is  different,  Why ?

WebsterMark wrote on 05/16/17 at 16:43:00:


Apples and oranges.  tweety was completely on his own and had no idea what was classified and what wasn't (you know, he hates his briefings).  Obama was briefed and knew exactly what intel could or should be shared.

HUGE different.

Nice try though....

They are as relevant as Sarah Palin.
Destroyed their own credibility.
Impossible to take people seriously who have no willingness to see when They are Wrong.
It's FUNNY, and you're the jokes. I've been playing along, waiting for you to completely ensnare yourselves, and Now it's apples and oranges..


Spell that out.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 05/16/17 at 20:26:09:


Well let's see....

One president was briefed, well informed and in touch with intelligence sources before he did anything.  He was also divulging US intelligence.

The other president ignored briefings (he said it himself), was not aware of what was classified and what wasn't and he was sharing intelligence from Israel - and they asked us NOT to share it.

Apples and oranges.  If you can't see the difference - LMAO - what am I saying?!?  Of course you can't!!

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 05/17/17 at 05:48:44:


Jog, love your using if the word cheapness......
Yes, as seen with the last SC judge confirmed, we witnessed a tactic the left deployed to get their results, yet foul when its turned back on them.
They talk about tolerance, yet don't exhibit it themselves.
The list is long, and their blindness selective.
However, I believe Trump has cheapened himself.
He has shown a extreme lack of verbal discipline.
He has effectively cheapened dialogue.
He has caused his own grief.
His demeanor is very suspect, aside from all the charges.
If you can't see that, then you are as blind as those on the left, in my opinion.

Turn a blind eye to to tweety, and he'll poke them both out.

All you "conservatives" go right on ahead hating on hillary, true democrats feel the same way - but you should get the point - she's done.  Her career is over and the democratic establishment is on it's death bed.

Bernie sanders remains to be the most popular (in a positive sense) politician in the country.  He's polling higher than anyone.  That's no mistake.

But yeah, you go ahead and push that hillary narrative and see how far that gets you.  All it does is distract from the flaming pile of poo we have in the White House today.  You want him to stay? Then keep bringing up how terrible hillary is.  Ignore what's going on in the here and now and keep paying attention to a candidate that lost.  Keep thinking that we would have been worse off with her instead of seeing what tweety is really doing and why, and for who?

Let us all know how that works out for ya...