Seems you may be losing sight of what's REALLY important here.
But if you need "closure" on hillary - simply ignore what he said in September of 2016 (because it was out of line, right?) - and read his official statement from July 5, 2016:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-ja...The reason I say you might be losing sight of the real issue is that, well, look at what's happened in the last 72 hours.
It's been confirmed that comey went to Rosenstein's office for more resources to investigate.
tweety met with the russian foreign minister and had ZERO US press allowed in... yeah, that's normal....
How many have fled the nest tweety's tried to build?
Is there any validity to the the beavis & butt-head - err - eric and dj comments about the millions pouring in from russia?
tweety flat-out accused Obama of wiretapping with no proof whatsoever. (btw, there has been NOTHING found to support tweety's accusation). That, by definition is obstruction. But hey, let's say that there is no wrongdoing on tweety's part. Let's say that oh - "he's just being flippant"... OK - where do you draw the line? When is enough, enough? Should the president of the United States be held accountable for his actions?
Let's put the "what if" in the oval office, shall we? What if tweety's tax returns show russian money in his company? What then? Are we going to OK that? It's already well known that rex tilly is literally worth half a trillion dollars to russia. That seems to be OK. I mean, a secretary of state that ran an oil company is... well... what? A great idea??
All of tweety's cabinet members have been passed by the narrowest of margins. Maybe there's something to that.
There's LOTS more to come on this. No way it's going to stop now.
So enough of the hillary emails - it's been done.