justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
Offline
What happened?
Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
|
airly large sum of money.
The New York times article linked above contains a two disturbing paragraphs;
"As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock."
The disgusting irony of Clinton's accusations against the Trump campaign, is that she herself has direct, provable and inarguable links to the Russian government through various sources that are severe enough to be considered direct national security threats - and yet she claims Trump and co. are Russian agents. It may seem unthinkable to radical liberals that some just want good will with powerful nation states capable of utilizing vast resources for good, such as Russia, and that everyone who supports Russia should be be an agent of some kind.
With revelations such as these, I'm sure the Trump milieu is, yet again, tired of winning.
Gotta go all the way, read the corrections.
|