Quote:


We will see, I suppose. I think it would be a mistake to underestimate Trump's follower's ability to understand perfectly well what he did, and why he did it though.

The Clintons will slink back to Chappaqua, Hillary will take walks in the woods and take selfies with dipsh*ts, and by Monday nobody will remember a thing about the luncheon.

Well my take thus far is a lot of liberal pundits appear unhinged....
Some folks seem to think their views and beliefs as gospel, and they take this as a personal rejection.....
Talk about an inferiority complex on top of being egoistical sumbeech, to boot, goodness.

The protesters seemed a dud, as to what was forecasted, I guess Soro's wasn't paying as well now that his gravy train is drying up  

But too, I believe I am seeing some libs coming to grips with reality.
I think they too see how stupid some of these demonstrations are, and want no part of that insanity....

Jog is right, of course she's guilty, but let's keep something in mind, Trump can't just lock anyone up, he can't even indict anyone. My guess is if she shuts up and fades away, this gets dropped. If she yaps and tries to remain an active player, it will never go away.

raydawg wrote on 01/20/17 at 11:55:27:


THIS !

Joer0952 wrote on 01/21/17 at 05:38:03:


That's party politics at it's best .....

So watched some of it yesterday.
Gives me a lot of hope.

But, I see the   ‘Talking Heads’, on the News stations,
haven’t learned,  just became more, ‘subtle’.

News: The Pres, said/did this.  (A Yea,  we can see that)
    So it is confirmed.
Opinion:  the Pres, is thinking this, and doing that, that way because…

News:  “Their are rioters, just 6 blocks over” (A Yea, again we can see that)
Opinion:  “Those people are rioting  because they believe this and that”
   But did  NOT,  talk to them.

Guess the talking Heads, are a magic mind reader,
because they did not interview any of them,
yet were able to say exactly what they were thinking.

Then we have the, reg scheduled, news, where the stories were running 3-1  in favor of the protesters.
And when a  reporter got close enough, (to the peaceful ones), to do a  interview.
When it was over, the talking heads, Still told you ‘WHAT’ they  'want' you to believe, they said.
 (Which was different than, when they interviewed the peaceful ones)

So, regardless of what happens.   I guess, some people, just want to ‘complain’.
And take the, ‘other’ side,  Just  because it is the, ‘Other’ side.
Not because of their own, beliefs.

Like ALL, those people that said,
 “I’m  Leaving”  (But did not)
Guess, they were brought up to say anything they want,
and never worry, if they don’t ‘do’, because they think everyone else,
is just as gutless, and shallow as they are.

Has,  ANYONE,  left for  Canada, Yet?

Time to sit back,  (and from all indications so far),
watch this Country grow again.

And remember, ‘…will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."

Joer0952 wrote on 01/21/17 at 05:38:03:

WebsterMark wrote on 01/21/17 at 05:24:59:

Jog is right, of course she's guilty, but let's keep something in mind, Trump can't just lock anyone up, he can't even indict anyone. My guess is if she shuts up and fades away, this gets dropped. If she yaps and tries to remain an active player, it will never go away.

Also, right now he is trying to unify the government and indicting her, as much as I would love it, would drive the democrats even further away then they already are.  It the attorney general indicted her trump could cure cancer and end world hunger and the democrats would still fight him tooth and nail

OK... guilty of what?  Why has she never been indited?  Why have there been no charges brought up?  Is she that much of a master criminal, or are the republicans going after her that dumb?

Seriously, I don't have any sympathy for the woman - but all I see and hear is rumor and conspiracy theories - no facts.  Rhetoric and rumor, combined with a hate of liberals has been the only "evidence" that I can see.