What I learnt, from last night....

No, I already knew this.

Trump called Clinton a “nasty woman.” Clinton called Trump the “most dangerous” person to run for president in modern history.

Yep, she is as nasty as a snake it low.
He is a wild card, and dangerous, but mostly to the established aristocrats who have FRUCKED the middle class, working man, WOMAN, minorities, over for decades now.....

My wife is voting for him.
All my kids are.
Most of the union folk ( that I know )  at work are.
Saw Trump bumper stickers yesterday on cars, haven't seen a hag yet....
Lots of Bernies.

I still won't vote for the man.
Might be a spell before I get any.

I'll vote Jill, yep, as a protest vote, same as those voting for Trump....
And hope Hillary understands the gravity of the deplorable, or she can rot her sorry azz in Haiti, in exile....

For that will be her lot.

Times are a changing, of that I am certain, where we go depends on us, the folks, talking to each other, listening, trying to find understandings and solutions when we can, and holding no animosities when we can't.

As Liz Warren said yesterday, only directed to one party, PUT ON YOUR BIG BOY PANTIES, she got it half right!    

Yes, yes, the woman can't draw a crowd of supporters, fewer hats and bumper stickers, the DNC had to STEAL the nomination for her, but she's ahead.

Gee, you wouldn't think the leftist media and poll takers might be Telling us she's ahead in public opinion so that when they steal the election it won't be a conflict with the polls leading up to the selection, do you?
The machines have been PROVEN to be hackable with ease.

Is it just ME or did I see an election that the dems said was stolen? Bush got selected. Gore got gored. Seems odd to me that the Supreme Court would demand the stopping of a recount. And BASE the decision not on law, but on a politically opportunistic Reading of the law.

. For example, the five justices of the majority had previously and conversely granted great deference to state court decisions, and all were Republican appointees. Yet perhaps the harshest criticism came from the Court itself. In the concluding lines of his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens proclaimed that "one thing ... is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law."

I'm on record stating that I didn't believe Bush had won.

The dems are on RECORD as believing that the voting was rigged, but to suggest that it might be a rigged system Now is just a sure sign of lunacy, AFTER IT WAS DEMONSTRATED that the DNC Rigged it against Bernie.

The disconnect from reality and the immeasurable hypocrisy is just STUNNING!

Serowbot wrote on 10/20/16 at 08:26:46:


Oh she'll win, if that I'm certain, but you will be the one chitting all over himself.....
She'll abandon you as quick as all the pretty girls in a biker bar when another guy rides up on a bike that has two jugs !!!!  

Enjoy your calm before the storm called deplorable