justin_o_guy2 wrote on 10/10/16 at 16:44:56:LostArtist wrote on 10/10/16 at 15:34:16:verslagen1 wrote on 10/10/16 at 12:37:10:LostArtist wrote on 10/10/16 at 11:06:09:either way, the REPUBLICAN FBI investigated, NOTHING. Comey found that Hillary was stupid but not CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT, he said there would be repercussions if Hillary was still in the position she was but she's now a Civilian so it's hard to enact those repercussions on a civilian.
Not quite what he said...
Quote:But even as Comey said the FBI wouldn't recommend charges -- the final decision will be made by the Department of Justice -- he also delivered a scathing verbal indictment of her behavior. Here are seven quotes from Comey on an issue that is sure to reverberate into the fall campaign:
1. "Extremely careless"
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
2. "Should have known"
"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."
3. "Especially concerning"
"None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at agencies and departments of the United States government -- or even with a commercial email service like Gmail."
4. "Still obligated to protect it"
"Only a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked 'classified' in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."
5. "Generally lacking"
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information that is found elsewhere in the government.
6. "Hostile actors"
"We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent."
7. "Sophisticated adversaries"
"She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's personal email account."
...wouldn't recommend charges... he would like to remain in office... alive.
thanks for spelling it all out, still, in sum, = stupid, not criminal
She had years in DC. It was her JOB to know the difference.
I say criminal,you say
Stupid...
And Vote FOR stupid for president.
Do be aware that Comey STATED
Anyone caught in the same position couldn't expect to Not be prosecuted.
IF people are able,
They should try to understand that what he was SAYING WAS
if she wasn't Hillary Clinton she would be in court.
You're celebrating a double standard.
You're CELEBRATING a double standard that makes all Americans serfs.
But, it's your side winning, so it's okay.
Where are you buying your blinders?
first, Clinton isn't MY side.
I vote all across the spectrum, Libertarian, Republican, Democrat, it really does quite vary
Comey actually said: consequences, not prosecution. "Although there is evidence of
potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like
the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts.
All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that
in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."
Pages: 
