raydawg wrote on 10/06/16 at 05:06:33:Well, what I found interesting is that neither answered her first question, in context.
The forum/debate was, should, have been what would they do if the had to exucute the role of becoming president if needed.
It quickly turned to jumping in the top of each ticket.
Am I to understand then, that they see their role as continuing on all the beliefs, policies, agenda(s) exactly as the one they replaced, or can they be original and distinct in their own administration, if need be.
I don't ever wish to be a proverbial rubber stamp to anybody, or anything, never.
That would be akin to wearing the same speedo everyday, arg!
you actually want a politician to answer a question?? like directly??
no, no, no, see, first, you have to make that question a talking point, then maybe, maybe the other side will address it, then, maybe a pundit will get sick of hearing about it and complain about it for 4 more days than anyone asked for, then maybe, maybe, if you are lucky and the wind is blowing at 4 knots over a grasshoppers left knee then that grasshopper will kick and that wind will eventually blow up the candidate's nose and he'll sneeze out the truth.
I've noticed that Pence is really quite skilled at not answering questions and redirecting them. not that Hillary is bad at that either
Pages: 1
