Quote:


Nice sentiment raydawg but it's not going to happen. Too late for that. Might just as well vote for whomever you hate the least and move on.

There will be blood running in the streets before anything changes.

raydawg wrote on 09/14/16 at 05:14:39:



I believe this mentality, a two party only viability is orchrastrated by the two parties.
Some of the behind the scene emails revealed, the apparent secrecy, the deal making, etc, lends much testimony that they care about themselves, more than any extenuating problems they know the commoners are experiencing.
It really is an aristocracy!

Thank You for pointing out what is so obvious that most people Never actually bring it to complete THOUGHT, it's something everyone knows inherently.
Remember what they did to Ron Paul.
They did everything they could to keep him out of the debates.
When that failed,the questions and limited time were designed to make him look like he was a joke.
I voted for him, anyway.

Why don't We take the two party, actually one party, system apart?
That's a great idea. A Principled stand, vote for
Other Than either party.

Who believes Ron Paul really WAS a republican?
He was registered as one, wasn't he?
He's a Libertarian, a constitutional libertarian.
But he HAD to register as republican, or be excluded from the debates.

Trump, former Hillary supporter, is REGISTERED as a bub..

What makes it true? Is he a bub?

Consider Hillary's new supporters.
Koch brothers, the neocons, plenty of deplorables.
The status quo types support HER.
Anyone who wants more war, more BAD trade deals, more immigration, immigrants, many of whom are hostile to America and many are SICK.

So, now is nit the time for proving a point.
It's TIME to be absolutely sure we Don't get Hillary.

You need a plumber,... but you've had bad experience with plumbers in the past...
So,.. this time, you're gonna' hire a baker.

Are you suggesting that only lifelong politicians can solve the problem?

and won't die in office.

Serowbot wrote on 09/14/16 at 08:50:19:


This is why you are voting for Hillary ?????  Blahhahaaaaaa

A reply/comment ( I read ):

It's not impossible to predict the election, but as Dershowitz, there points out there are many events that could make dramatic shifts in how people vote. We have two of the worst and the two most unpopular candidates ever, and that makes it difficult to predict turnout.

One factor that Dershowitz did not focus on is Clinton's health. Clinton has been wearing blue tinted glasses, which help to prevent seizures in people with epilepsy and people with Parkinson's disease. Clinton could also be wearing blue tinted glasses as a fashion statement.

I thought that Clinton might have Parkinson's disease, but a friend who is an expert on episodic LOC disagreed. This is what she said:

I disagree.

We can see beyond a doubt that she has partial complex seizures and know for a fact that she suffered head trauma and a cerebral vein thrombosis.
We also know for a fact that seizures can occur after head trauma and the 6 month period for rest after the trauma indicates that she had a serious brain injury and not simply a concussion as had been reported.
Hillary has episodic LOC and absolutely nothing consistent with Parkinson's Disease - no mask facies, no shuffling gait, no pill rolling tremor, etc.
Parkinson's Disease does not cause intermittent LOC.

Postulating Parkinson's is a violation of Occam's Razor, which is a basic tenet of medical diagnostics. Stated plainly, never diagnose 2 conditions when 1 will explain everything.

She had head trauma complicated by venous thrombosis which increased intravascular pressure in the brain and also caused direct injury to the brain surface. Over the next 12 months she developed seizures ranging from petit mal, partial complex to complex. Complex seizures or generalized grand mal can occur in 3 forms, tonic, tonic clonic, or atonic in which there is no generalized muscle movement but instead flaccid muscles. They simply loose consciousness for 3 minutes with no clear way of differentiating it from cardiac syncope. It will be followed by the classic post ictal confusion which could last for hours, then they look fine. And BTW I seriously doubt this pneumonia thing. But if she did have pneumonia, that too is consistent with seizures and aspiration if such occurred during a meal or a drink.

In addition do not forget that she is on coumadin and could also have cerebral angioid angiopathy, a condition in which the small vessels of the brain (usually of someone over 60) rupture causing multiple micro bleeds into the cerebral cortex. The blood functions as an irritant and sets up the electrical impulses that trigger seizures. It is an unappreciated disease that could very well explain what is going on even if the head trauma did not produce a post traumatic seizure disorder.

The story/article:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/09/13/why-impossible-predict-this-ele...