WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 14023
Gender:
|
ok, let's say I legitimately owe you money, you took me to small claims court and the judge says I owe you money, I don't pay, not for DECADES, we aren't friends, let's say you're an @sshole (JOG, you aren't but for sake of argument) you take my motorcycle just because you are an @sshole, then finally, I get some money to make a down payment, not even the whole thing, but before I pay it, I tell you to give my motorcycle back.
Was that money ransom for my motorcycle? (the money I already owed you, BEFORE you even knew I had a motorcycle)
I read this before and intended to comment but got busy.
First off; I don't believe a US President should have given Iran anything other than the middle finger. If some 'world court' decided we owed them money back for a weapons deal, I would have said sure, fine here's your money minus $xxx amount for the survivors of every hostage you took. Oh gee, that comes up to exactly 400 million. Sorry guys...
But that's another topic.... Lost analogy is wrong. Stealing a bike is a crime in and of itself. Kidnapping people is a crime in and of itself.
And yes, paying the money to get your bike back is ransom. If he didn't have the bike, you wouldn't have paid. Your motivation to pay is to get your property back, lacking that, you wouldn't have paid.
Also, not that the dictionary is the final arbitrator of definitions because words take on different meanings based on the situation, the word ransom is associated with the return of prisoners. Those 4 were not free to leave on their own so they were in fact, prisoners.
Now, you could say paying property taxes is paying ransom because if you don't they'll take your house. I would say yes, paying taxes is a form of ransom.
Unfortunately, we'll find out soon enough if this was 'ransom'. If it was, they'll do the same technique again.
|