Gee, I guess you guys use different glasses than me....
Yes, I know the little guy was in with the Clinton's, YET, he can still look at things objectively, as this article examples.
Yes, he supports Hillary, but unlike Bot who post the republicans are dinosaurs, this man sees what is transpiring in politics as a vote against the same old system, which Hillary excels at....
And he warns his own party, unlike Bot, to take it serious.
This is not an affirmation of her, just like Obama, who once seated went on to lose more seats for his party ever....
That folks is NOT affirmation, no matter how Bot spins it, those are factual results, not spin!
The only problem for the "right" is they put their money on the wrong horse....
They rejected the same old bush ponies, etc, yet placed their bet on a horse that lacks any stamina to finish a race he starts

The tea party was the first salvo leveled against it, not affirmation of the status quo.
The bush party has blood on its hands if Hillary wins, WHICH I believe they would rather have, than Trump.
I base this not so much on Trump himself, which to me is enuff anyways

But because they DO understand that it's a vote against them and the power structure that allows them to prosper, which is what Robert Reich is talking about, except he assigns that to both parties.
As I said before, the old system is under attacks, on both flanks, as it should be. I am not even sure if the two party system can stand against it, eventually yielding to new players.....
How about the Chicano party, or gay party, well?