this needs further clarification. what's the backstory here?

Serowbot wrote on 04/27/16 at 23:32:51:


That is the epitome of the liberal mentality.  The rules do not apply to me and do what I say and not what I do.

Best regards,

pg wrote on 04/28/16 at 04:06:41:



Bigots?

WOW! You get to label someone as hateful if you don't like what they say, and go nuts on them.. I've NEVER wanted to cuss you out as badly as right now. Man, talk about the heights of being a jackass. But, thanks for clearing that up. If a crappity smacking leftie gets in my face now, I know it's okay to break hjs, or her, face. I can label and punish hate just as well.

see some of my brothers in Christ exhibit it by refusing to bake a cake, or killing a doctor who practices a legal procedure....


Whoaaa, dude!
Choosing to not contract with someone who wants me to aid them in doing what I don't want anything to do with is completely reasonable.

Killing someone? No way.
One is a peaceful choice to not participate.
Murder? That you can conflate the two explains a bit.

I am sure you remember Smoky the Bear....
He had one poster that showed how a forest burned from one match.
One little match had the capacity to destroy a whole forest and much of the life living within it...
One of the trees burned to the ground could have made many, many, many, of those matches!

What came first, anger or hate?

I had a guy comment to me today about how the next war will be fought over socialism and captilism, except this time it will be within our own borders, on our own soil....
I replied, don't you see how you are letting others decide your fate by dictating and assigning connotations to words?
He looked at me quizzically....
I further explained, are all things either right or wrong?
Why can't we borrow elements from captilism and socialism that serve the best interest to the most folks, instead of just one or the other in total?
He had no answer....
But oh how much easier for the power brokers to separate, and conquer, than to fight against a united front....

Serowbot wrote on 04/27/16 at 23:32:51:


And if someone one day arbitrarily labeled atheists as "hateful" and "intolerant," can we hate you, Bot? Pretty please!   Can we enact reverse discrimination on you because those protected classes need your job? Remember, if you don't kiss their (our) rears with everything you say, you'll be tarred, feathered, and run out of town with torches and pitchforks because, congratulations, you're now labeled a bigot. Bwahahahaha!

(I speak lightly, of course.)

Cultural Marxism: the term of the day.

Remember Bot, It's a two way street. Who are you or anyone else to make those judgments? It's all too easy to take everyday ramblings and make harsh judgments about speakers' characters and call them bigots over some misused, overblown BS. You just can't sling that argument everywhere because, soon enough, you'll be calling everyone a bigot, and everybody is going to be censored and hated on. Now ain't that a dystopia?

Not sayin' there aren't some bigots out there that don't deserve being dipped in hot tar. There are probably plenty of them which come from all sides of the political/philosophical spectrum. There are some pretty annoying lefties out there. For example, how many guys here enjoy the rantings of extreme leftist groups like... say... PETA? Need I say more?

Does the left get to hold a double standard? Come on, Bot, let everybody speak. We can weed out the dangerous ones later. Besides, if you attack them and try to silence them, you'll only support their cause.

Tell me, are liberals as open-minded as they say they are? If so, why would you want to beat up all the opposing viewpoints?