Gus
Senior Member
Offline
Thumpers Rock!
Posts: 491
Minnesota
Gender:
|
Along side my Savage there are as many differences as similarities:
The seat is wider and more plush on the gz250 The tank is nearly a gallon bigger on the 250 Looks like the 250 came with Metzler tires(unless someone changed them out.) bike only has 1000 miles on it. 250 has a trip meter. Hah!!! The mirrors are rubber mounted in two different locations on the 250. The headlights are a mirror image of one another. I think the handlebars are too. The main frame looks to be very similar. The 250cc engine cylinder is tipped forward, therefore allowing for a radically smaller engine space.
Like the 650 the seat on the 250 is too low in the front. I think its even lower than the Savage. You really feel like your sliding onto the tank.
The carbs. Are identical in design and different in size, of course. The fuel tank petcock is the exact poor design as the Savage. The triple tree's on the Savage are a little more refined and cleaned up.
The buttons on the handlebars on the 250 are much more modern .
What is mostly apparent in looking at these two thumpers made the same year by the same company is this: And its been said before. The Savage/S40 design hasn't been reviewed by the engineers in many, many years. The S40 is obviously one of their "bread & butter bikes. They sell enough of them year after year, with no changes, to justify running the molds every year.
|