Serowbot wrote on 12/27/15 at 21:50:19:Allow me to present this as a moral dilemma...
... or,.. a "what would Jesus do?"...
What is a "moral" decision?...
When is your morality questioned?...
It is when you are asked to make a decision based on right vs wrong, without consideration of how it will effect you and yours...
Any decision that is to your benefit... asks nothing from you.
When a decision asks that you set aside selfish reasoning, and do something that may not better your circumstance... may even worsen, or endanger your personal realm of security... that you are making a moral decision...
In spite of it's effect on me and mine,... this is the right thing to do...
Millions of people are running terror... and amongst those millions, there may be a few that mean you harm...
Well, ask yourself that question. What personal impact will mass immigration from suspect countries have on you, Sew?
What impact will it have on Obama, Hilary?
The answer to both questions is no impact.
The top politicians will always have armed guards and be protected.
You are just one in 300 million in this country so the odds are in your favor you won't be shot at a concert, blown apart watching a marathon, killed at a Christmas work party or shot down at a military base by an officer.
Someone will, but it won't be you or Hilary or Obama.
This WWJD moral delemma for you is nothing of the sort. There is no delemma, you risk nothing either. This is a political ideology exercise, that's all. And as such, you're required to take the liberal position which while perhaps heartwarming, is nonetheless, foolish and dangerous.
A great analogy is that liberals are like children and conservatives like adults. Adults desperately need children to keep them from driving in in a rut and not venturing out, but children desperately need adults to keep them from driving off a clifff.