I would like to thank WebsterMark and HovisPresley for the amusing chitchat and congratulate them because I haven't had such a good time since my last go at Monty Python.
Mayflower... ancient history...
1. The Mayflower never existed. She was the "
Fleur de Mai" (Mayflower in English), a french cargo which had just neen bought by the Florentine Medicis (of Lorenzo de Medici fame) to sail the merchant ports of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, and the ship's Captain was due to report in Livorno (Leghorn to you) only the following spring. So he thought it was a good idea to accept a contract to sail a bunch of Puritans confined to the pier of Plymouth port to the New World.
(The truth of the matter is the Puritans had fled England and settled down in Amsterdam; their lifestyle, however, was so rock-rigid puritan they were eventually "encouraged to leave" (Christian Talibans of the 17th Century?) and the only place they could go was... England. They were denied entry, however, and were confined to living "in the open" on a pier of Plymouth Port, until they could find a ship to ferry them elsewhere. THIS is the story told in England - and THEY have the historical records to prove it, not just legendary storytelling)
As for the issue of "Mayflower - Fleur de Mai", here is an excerpt from an interesting essay:
"
Mary Antin is right when she looks upon our foreign- born as the people who missed the Mayflower and came over on the first boat they could find. But she forgets that when they did come it was not upon other Mayflower but upon a 'Fleur,' a 'Fleur de Mai,' a 'Fleur di Maggio,' a 'Majblomst.' "
Source:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1916/07/trans-national-america/30...Where, incidentally, it PROVES the early colonists had no intention whatsoever to melt into the existing culture and adopt their ways.
Else you guys would all be American Indians...
You may also read a funny (humorous) rendition of the origins of Thanksgiving by Art Buchwald here:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=932&dat=19911128&id=5JY0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=0...2. What WebsterMark seems to omit is that
these fierce, blood-curdling ISIS terrorists are actually preying on... fellow Muslims.
Yes, they have slit Christian throats and sold their daughters into slavery (and I, for one, am livid that European political leaders and the Pope himself all seem to be sitting on their hands on this one) but the truth of the matter is the Iraqi Army (equipped and traned by you guys) is next to helpless, the Syrian Army (equipped and trained by the Russians) is only marginally more effective (motivaiton?) the Turkish Army (equipped and trained by you guys) have had their ass kicked and the only ones who seem capable of getting the job done are... [drum roll, please] Navy SEALS?
NO, it was the IraniansLike it or not, when it's time for boots on the ground, the only ones who kicked any ISIS ass in mass (not precision
strike and flee ops) were the Iranians.
Oh, and, by the way... Given that the BUSH Dynasty is so hand in hand with the Saudi Royal Family... why on earth is Saudi Arabia not doing anything with ISIS tearing down Muslim Holy Sites ?
![Huh Huh](/yabb2.2/Templates/Forum/new/huh.gif)
Kuwait is looking the other way, and the UAE and Bahrein are too busy celebrating their umpteenth ... luxury ... whatever ?
![Huh Huh](/yabb2.2/Templates/Forum/new/huh.gif)
I see disaster coming from below the horizon, I can already smell it, and it smells rancid...
![Lips Sealed Lips Sealed](/yabb2.2/Templates/Forum/new/lipsrsealed.gif)
Oh, but should WM worry, with Sen. John McCain photographed having talks with ISIS officials...
Watch it, Webstermark, lest "the enemy of my enemy has defeated my enemy and is now turning on me..." if you understand my words of warning...
3. Social Security and free handouts to young (juvenile) unwed mothers.
Yes, those who condemn "the system" for giving a "paycheck" to unwed mothers are right. In some Countries, to the eyes of a high school dropout, having more and more babies can become a fulltime job, the more babies, the more monies.
Actually, in other Countries (i.e. Italy) the baby is the direct beneficient of the SS treatment, not the mother, and once an unwed, jobless mother graduates to "baby #2" she is right in the sights of Social Assistants.
The law says that baby #3 had better come with a full time Daddy, else the Juvenile Copurt kicks in and has the authority to take one (or more) babies to a "home" - either a foster home or an orphanage.
So you won't see unwed Mother Goose over here.