batman
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 3806
osceola new york
Gender:
|
Well it would seem that fuel delivery to the carbs are not the problem , that leaves air delivery to be the culprit . That leaves either the amount of air reaching the cylinder, the velocity of the air being to low to cause a high enough vacuum across the jets to pull in enough fuel or to atomize it into small enough droplets to burn (it's bad enough that only about 30% of the fuel is burned normally in a gas engine to begin with). So ... look at you Intake manifold, You used 2 inch silicon hose ,the inside diameter is 51mm(2 ") ,which you're now using on a stock carb of 40 mm (1.58 "),The areas of each being 3.14 sq in for the intake, but only 1.95 sq in for the carb ,slowing the velocity of the air in the intake by 1/3? I f that is not bad enough it is compounded by the double filters and Tee which may double the loss of velocity by doubling the size of the intake to 6.38 sq in. Where your intake may work at low rpm , the larger amount (mass) of air will be hard to accelerate at higher rpm when the intake valve opens,and the time to mix and fill the cylinder is limited to a few milliseconds LANCER once stated that the most useful velocity stack used in racing (that are the same diameter as the carb) were in the 6 "length . I used 2" schedule 40 pvc ,with an inside diameter very close to that of the stock carb, it is about 15"long and I have had no problems.Lancer usually recommends the smaller VM 36 carb for builds with the DR650 piston for the same reason(I believe).
|